 | William Shakespeare - 1833 - 522 pages
...Who hath it ? He that died o' Wednesday. Doth he feel it? No. Doth he hear it? No. Is it insensible then ? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living ? No. Why ? Detraction will not suffer it ; — therefore I 'll none of it. Honor is a mere scutcheon, and so ends my catechism. [Exit.... | |
 | William Shakespeare - 1836 - 570 pages
...Who hath it ? He that died o' Wednesday. Doth he feel it? No. Doth he hear it ? No. Is it insensible then ? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living ? No. Why ? Detraction will not suffer it. — Therefore I'll none of it ; honor is a mere scutcheon, and so ends my catechism. [Exit.... | |
 | 1837 - 474 pages
...! Who hath it ? He that died o'Wednesday. Doth he feel it ? No. Doth he hear ? No. Is it insensible then ? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living ? No. Why? Detraction will not suffer it ;— therefore I'll none of it. Honour is » mere scutcheon, and so ends my catechism." Though... | |
 | Henry O'CONNOR (Barrister-at-Law) - 1837 - 376 pages
...Who hath it ? He that died o' Wednesday. Doth he feel it? No. Doth he hear it ? No. Is it insensible then ? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living ? No. Why ? Detraction [according to his theory he might have said abstraction] will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of... | |
 | Wolfgang Clemen - 1987 - 232 pages
...reckoning! Who hath it? He that died aWednesday. Doth he feel it? No. Doth he hear it? No. 'Tis insensible, then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? No. Why? Detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honour is 140 a mere scutcheon — and so ends my catechism.... | |
 | Hans Speier - 1989 - 381 pages
...Who hath it? he that died a'Wednesday. Does he feel it? No. Doth he hear it? No. It is insensible, then? Yea. To the dead. But will it not live with the living? No. Why? Detraction will not suffer it, therefore, I'll none of it: honour is a mere scutcheon, and so ends my catechism.35 In accordance... | |
 | Orson Welles - 1988 - 356 pages
...it? He that died a Wednesday. Doth he feel it? No. // (The Prince looks away again.) Tis insensible then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? No. Why? (The Prince looks back.) Detraction will not suffer it. Therefore 1'll none of it. Honor is a mere... | |
 | Jerry Blunt - 1990 - 232 pages
...reckoning! Who hath it? He that died o' Wednesday. Doth he feel it? No. Doth he hear it? No. Tis insensible then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? No. Why? Detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honor is a mere scutcheon, and so ends my catechism. KING HENRY... | |
 | Richard Hoffpauir - 1991 - 348 pages
...reckoning! Who hath it? He that died a Wednesday. Doth he feel it? No. Doth he hear it? No. 'Tis insensible then? Yea, to the dead. But will [it] not live with the living? No. Why? Distraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honour is a mere scutcheon — and so ends... | |
 | 1875 - 398 pages
...Who hath it ? He that died o' Wednesday. Doth he feel it ? No. Doth he hear it ? No. It is insensible then ? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? No. Why? Detraction will not surfer it : therefore, I'll none of it : honour is a mere scutcheon, and so ends my catechism." I am... | |
| |
Wednesday. Doth he feel it ? No. Doth he hear it? No. Is it insensible then ? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living ? No. Why ? Detraction will not suffer it : — therefore I'll none of it: Honour is a mere 'scutcheon, and so ends my... 
