Page images
PDF
EPUB

66 Say, this becomes him,
(As his composure must be rare indeed
Whom these things cannot blemish.)

Dr. Johnson says, this is inconsequent, and Mr. Malone, though armed to defend the expression, abandons it as being harsh, but where is the harshness or inconsequence ? Dr. Johnson proposes to read and for as; but this alteration, instead of improving the sense, impairs it. “As” is preferable to “and,” because it denotes referential consequence, not simple connection; it is not so much association as inference; as we shall find in the following apposite instances : “ Utter my thoughts! Why say they are vile

' and false (As where's the palace whereinto foul things “ Sometimes intrude not!)

Who that reads this passage in Othello, could substitute and for as, without perceiving that he enfeebled the sense; it is a material part of lago's argument. “ As where's the palace,” i. e. agreeably to what I have been saying, where is the palace, &c. Again, in the same play: 6

I beseech you, “ Though I, perchance, am vicious in my gucss, (As I confess it is my nature's plague To spy into abuses,)” &c.

And in Cymbeline, Act 1, Scene 7: 66 I f this be true, " As I have such a heart that both mine ears $Must not in haste abuse.” 45. “ Yet must Antony

" No way excuse his soils.

This is Mr. Malone's alteration (and Mr. Steevens has adopted it) from the old copy which exhibits “ foils." Yet " foils,” I believe, is right; Lepidus had, a minute before, been extolling the virtues of Antony, and placing them in opposition to his frailties, which had only the effect of making those virtues more conspicuous; as darkness in the sky augments the lustre of the stars; and this darkness and those failings are the foils that Octavius alludes to ; it is impossible to be unmindful, here, of the same image as it is presented in Hamlet : “I'll be your foil, Laertes : in mine ignorance “ Your skill shall, like a star i' the darkest night, " Stick fiery off-indeed.”

47. It hath been taught us from the primal

state, That he, which is, was wishd, until hewere;

And the ebb'd man, ne'er lovd, till ne'er ·

worth love, Comes dear'd, by being lack'd.Dr. Warburton's emendation. « dear'd." instead of " fear'd” (the former reading) is certainly judicious, though I do not think the passage will admit of his explanation; how can “he which is” be made to imply, the man in' supreme command. I believe that what we have been learning from the “primal state” is, merely, that he who was wished for, when he was away, being present, is no longer regarded ; and he who was never loved until his fortunes were ruined, becomes then an object of affection, when the sentiment can be of no use to him; and this affection is increased by considering that we want him. The second “ ne'er” was not, I suspect, any error of

is forteas well love." I is, as

the press, as Mr. Malone supposes, but only another instance of that resolute disposition to jingle and chime with words, so prevalent throughout these writings. “Till ne'er worth love" is, as I interpret, “till no longer worth love.” The explananation I have offered, as well as Dr. Warburton's amendment, is fortified by a similar passage in the 2d Scene of this play: “What our contempts do often hurl from us, “We wish it ours again“ She's good, being gone: “The hand could pluck her back that shov'd her

on."" Like a vagabond flag upon the stream.This is a line in syllables only: it should be:

“Like to a vagabond flag,” &c. Or, perhaps, better: E'en like a vagabond flag,” &c.

To rot itself with motion." · I wish that some of the commentarors had told us the meaning of “ rotting with motion.” The metre wants correction, which I would propose by dismissing two words from the messenger's. speech :

“ To rot itself with motion.” Mes. I bring word,” &c.

Mr Steevens would, to repair the measure, reject “itself;” but we find this word exactly so associated in Hamlet :

The fat weed " That rots itself in ease on Lethe's wharf.

· And this, I believe, will suggest the best explanation of the words before us--the weed on Lethe was stagnantly rotting; but here, the “ vagabond flag.” is rotting while in motion. 50.“ — Thy cheek

“ So much as lank'd not." Did not so much as shew lankness: the expression is similar to that of he lords it, i. e. he puts on or exercises lordly deportment.

Assemble we immediate council.

This reading, instead of "me,” in the old copy appears to have been introduced by the editor of the second folio, on better ground than what Mr. Malone assigns to him, viz. that this use of a me," though frequent, in familiar dialogue, does not occur on grave occasions. Hotspur, besides the example in the letter which he reads, 6 he writes me here,” relating afterwards to the kings herald, the cause of his hostility, and the conduct of Henry, observes,

" He then

Steps me a little higher than his word.” But, in the present instance, Octavius is speaking to his partner in the empire, and could not, without indecorum, have expressed himself in the rejected phrase. 51. It is my busines too. Farewell.

I suppose, to this hemistic belonged, “ good Lepidus.

SCENE V.

52. " 'Tis well for thee, That, being unseminar'd, thy freer

thoughts May not fly forth of Egypt.'Tis well for thee that, being an eunuch, your freer thoughts (that is, your amorous imaginations) do not torment you in the absence of the person you might have loved, by following him to Italy or elsewhere, as my affections do Antony. “ Free,” here, is liberal, like the hand of Desdemona, that required “a sequester from liberty,” “a frank one." The metre requires the ejection of “thou:" “May not fly forth of Egypt. Hasť affections ?" 54. “ Sovereign of Egypt, hail !"

This will not agree with the measure: we might read:

" With looking on his life. Aler. Egypt, all hail !” 55.A termagant steed.

This, Mr. M. Mason's emendation of “ armgaunt,” the former reading, agrees with the sense, and may, perhaps, be right; but it is so bold a correction, that I confess I cannot help entertaining some doubt of it, though I wish to adopt it.

LORD CHEDWORTH. “ Arm-gaunt.” We may reasonably suppose, (says Mr. Davies, D. M. vol ii. p. 342) that the horse which bore Marc Antony, was remarkable for size and beauty: the Romans were particu

« PreviousContinue »