Page images
PDF
EPUB

PAGE

[ocr errors]

The design of the historical parts of Scripture-it is essentially
different from that of all other histories-The evidence which
the history affords to the truth of the Gospel. General view
of the history of the Old Testament as preparing the way

CHAP. VII.

CHAP. VIII.

5

EVIDENCE, &c.

CHAPTER I.

THE NECESSITY OF A DIVINE REVELATION.

WHILE the indispensable necessity of a divine revelation is strenuously denied, its utility and importance seem not to be questioned by modern writers on moral science. They deign occasionally to mention Christianity as the most perfect religion, and compliment its tendencies to promote the virtue and happiness of mankind. They praise its benevolence, and admire the purity and perfection of its moral precepts. But it must be evident to any one who has looked into their systems, that though not avowedly hostile, they are almost without exception incompatible with the supposition of the necessity of a supernatural revelation, and even with the truth of the doctrines which it has promulgated. Their natural religion, in its discoveries by the unaided light of reason, seems to them to be inferior to Christianity only in its clearness and sanctions; yet they exhibit human nature under such views, that notwithstanding some trifling imperfections and weaknesses, it may very easily mount to the heights of the most arduous virtue, and by sterling merit gain an eternity of happiness. No derangement evidential of the fall is at all discovered in the mental faculties, nor any alienation from God; and goodness is indicated by

[blocks in formation]

the appearances of human nature in its desires, pursuits, and practices. Man in all respects appears still the very same as when he came pure from the hands of his Creator. If he is susceptible of evil, he is without any natural bias to vice, and the very propensities of his nature, which, according to the Apostle Paul, subject him to condemnation by the holy law of God, serve only to exalt his virtue, by affording him an opportunity of displaying a more meritorious and rigid self-denial. In their systems of theology, they generally exhibit mercy as one of the attributes of God, discoverable by reason. But they have never been able to make it consistent with justice. Nor is it possible for any scheme to harmonize these attributes that does not make full compensation to the latter. To ascribe mercy to God according to the views they give of it, is to ascribe to him a blemish instead of a perfection.

But, waving their defects, it is enough, in order to lower the pretensions of these systems, to strip them of all they have borrowed from Christianity. The builders of moral systems, while they avowedly draw from the light of nature alone, usually take all the materials that the discoveries of the gospel have thrown in their way, as far as these coincide with their predilections. In a scheme of moral science each exhibits the whole of his theological creed. What is agreeable to his prejudices he readily finds in the light of nature, and never reflects that what appears to him the discovery of reason is the dictate of pure revelation; or, though deducible from the works of God, has lain hid from the wisest of mankind. To settle any controversy of this kind there is a standard of indubitable authority. Nothing can be justly claimed by the modern philosopher but what he can point out in ancient discoveries. Whatever the religion

« PreviousContinue »