Page images
PDF
EPUB

Table IV. Showing Results of Agglutination and Fixation Tesis conducted at frequent

intervals.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

No. 236 was bred to bull which had record of transmitting infection. † Artificial infection with B. abortus. No. 240 vulyar infection. No. 135 vulvar. No. 138 intraurethral. No. 239 subcutaneous. No. 242 intraurethral. No. 19 subcutaneous. No. 137 vulvar. No. 18 intraurethra. No. 241 intraurethral. No. 437 subcutaneous. No. 136 intravulvar.

Cow No. 136 was negative over a period of about three months, then became positive, remained so for about six weeks, reverted to doubtful, then again to positive, and after this wavered in the fixation reaction until at the end she was practically negative.

No. 236 was bred to a bull having a record of transmitting infection, while negative to both tests. Six weeks later she was a complete reactor, and continued so. She aborted two months after the last test.

No. 437 changed over from negative to positive very soon after subcutaneous injection of abortus antigen, and continued positive by both methods to the end.

TABLE IV. Showing Results of Agglutination and Fixation Tests conducted at frequent

intervals.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]

No. 18 changed from negative, after artificial infection, to positive, remained positive for a short time, and then reverted to negative (both tests). No. 19 became doubtful then positive, after artificial injection, remained positive a short time, and after prolonged wavering reverted to full negative.

No. 135 became a confirmed reactor after intravulvar infection, and remained so to the end, when she aborted. No. 138 changed to full positive after intraurethral injection,

very soon returned to negative by both methods. No. 239, after subcutaneous injection, became positive, and except for a temporary wavering, remained so to the end.

but

52

No. 249 slowly went over to doubtful, then reverted to full negative, and finally became full positive.

No. 242 wavered a long time after intraurethral injection, and at the end gave double negative reactions.

It will be seen in Table IV that all of the animals were clearly negative to both tests until after artificial infection, and that in several instances the negative tests extended over long periods of time, preliminary to infection.

BRIEF DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY.

By paying particular attention to the production of a potent bacterial antigen which is at best but slightly anti-complementary, and by following the rules governing both the agglutination and the complement fixation tests, these methods may be applied satisfactorily in the diagnosis of infectious abortion. Their constancy and reliability make them indispensable in the study and control of this disease.

We believe that the two methods are of equal importance, though of course the agglutination test is by far the simpler and more economic. However, for careful diagnosis the one serves as a check on the other, and it appears to us that the use of the one or the other alone would rob the serological diagnosis of much of its value, and leave the laboratory diagnostician very much in doubt as to the accuracy and value of his results.

The different tables show remarkable constancy of reactions, or where changes occur from negative to positive or from positive to negative, logical and steady transitions and consistency in the recorded data.

Occasional irregularities in the results of the tests must be conceded. Of particular concern to the operator are the negative reactions which are at times given by infected and even aborting cows at or near the time of calving. Various explanations have been offered for these results but only one appears to have received any serious consideration. According to this theory the infected animal is at this time so heavily charged with the Bang bacillus that when the blood is tested there is such an abundance of antigen in it as to neutralize its own agglutinin and anti-bodies in the presence of sufficient complement and therefore fail to react with the reagents of the test. This explanation has, however. not as yet been founded on sufficient evidence to be regarded as more than a theory.

The possibility of obtaining negative results by the two serological methods at or near the time of calving of infected animals should always be kept in mind, and further tests should be made on such animals after an appreciable interval following the calving. These apparent anomalies do not, however, seriously detract from the value of the tests.

REFERENCES
BANG, B., 1897. Die Aetiologie des seuchenhaften Verwerfens. Zeitschr.

Thiermed., 1. 241-278.
BIRCH, R. R., and GILLMAN, H. L., 1924. A study of the Bang abortion

disease in cattle. Rept. N. Y. State Vet. College, for 1922-23,

62-155.
BOERNER, F., Jr., and STUBBS, E. L., 1924. Technic and comparative

studies of the agglutination and complement fixation tests for
bovine infectious abortion. Jour. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 45,

425-432.
BRÜLL, 2., 1911. Beitrag zur Diagnostik des infektiösen Abortus des

Rindes. Berlin. Thierärtzl. Wchschr., 27, 721-7.
CONNAWAY, J. W. 1921. Infectious Abortion in swine. Missouri Agric.

Exp. Sta. (Columbia). Bul. No. 187. June.
CONNAWAY, J. W. 1923. The Practical control of infectious abortion in

cattle. Idem, Bul. No. 201.
CONNAWAY, J. W., 1924. Contributions to knowledge of agriculture. Idem,

Bul. No. 210 (pp. 71-76).
FITCH, C. P., Boyd, W. L., and BILLINGS, W. A., 1919. Preliminary report

on the value of blood tests in the control of contagious abortion.

Jour. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., March.
GRINSTED, F. 1909. Die Agglutinationsprobe als Diagnosticum beim iniek-

tiösen Abortus der Kühe. Maanedsskrift für Dyrlaeger, 21, 395. HADLEY, F. B., and Beach, B. A., 1912. The diagnosis of infectious abor

tion in cattle by means of the complement fixation test. Wisc.

Agric. Exp. Sta. Research Bul. No. 24.
HART, G. H. 1923. Methods of controlling abortion. Calif. Agric. Exp.

Sta. (Berkeley, Calif.) Bul. No. 363, 271-293.
HOLTH, H. 1909. Die Agglutination und die Komplementbindungsmethode

in der Diagnose des seuchenhaften Verwerfens der Kühe. Berlin.

Thierärtztl. Wchschr., 25, 686-687.
LARSON, W. P., 1912. The complement fixation reaction in the diagnosis

of contagious abortion. Jour. Inf. Dis., 10, 178-185.
McFADYEAN, J., and STOCKMAN, S., 1912. The agglutination test in the

diagnosis of bovine contagious abortion. Jour. Comp. Path, and

Ther., 25, 22-38.
MOHLER, J. A., and TRAUM, J. 1914. Infectious abortion of cattle. U. S.

Dept. of Agric., B. A. I. Circ. No. 216, 147-183.
MOORE, V. A., and Fitch, C. P., 1912-1913. A study of infectious abortion

in Cattle. An. Rep. N. Y. State Vet. Col.
RETTGER, L. F., and WHITE, G. C., 1918. Infectious abortion in Cattle.

Storrs Agric. Exp. Sta. Bul. No. 93.
RETTGER, L. F., WHITE, G. C., and CHAPMAN, L. M. 1921. Infectious

abortion in Cattle. Storrs Agric. Exp. Sta. Bul. No. 108.
SEDDON, H. R., 1919. Studies in abortion disease. Jour. Comp. Path, and

Therap., 32, March.
Simms, B. T., and MILLER, F. W. 1922. Infectious abortion of cattle.

Oregon Agric. Exp. Sta. Bul. No. 192, Nov.
SURFACE, F. M. 1912. The diagnosis of infectious abortion in cattle.

Kentucky Agric. Exp. Sta. Bul. No. 166.
WALI, S. 1911. Ueber die Feststellung des seuchenhaften Abortus beim

Rinde durch Agglutination und Komplementbindung. Zeitschr. f.

Infektionskr. u. Hyg. d. Hausth. 10, 23-55, and 132-160.
WENNER, J. J., 1918. A note on bleeding guinea pigs and on preserving

sheep's erythrocytes. Jour. Immunol., 3, 389-393.
WHITE, G. C., RETTGER, L. F., and MCALPINE, J. G. 1924. Storrs Agric.

Exp. Sta. Bul. No. 123.
WHITE, G. C., RETTGER, L. F., and CHAPMAN, L. M., 1923. Infectious abor-

tion. Fourth Report. Idem, Bul. No. 112.
Zwick and ZOLLER, 1913 Ueber den infektiösen Abortus des Rindes. Arb.

a. d. kaiserl. Gesundheitsamte, 43, 1-129.

32

« PreviousContinue »