82 THE HOUSE IN WHICH SHAKSPEARE WAS BORN. A VIGNETTE ON THE TITLE PAGE. HISTORICAL NOTES.. EXPLANATORY NOTES. 361 383 1 ILOSOPLAVLE Wistorical Notes, The transactions contained in this historical he resumes in the first speech of this play. The drama are comprised within the period of about complaint made by King Henry in the last Act ten months; for the action commences with the of Richard the Second, of the wildness of his 'news brought of Hotspur having defeated the son, prepares the reader for the frolics which Scots ander Archibald earl of Douglas at Hol- are there to be recounted, and the characters medon, (or Halidown-hill,) which battle was which are now to be exhibited. Johnson. fought on Holy-rood day, (the 14th of Septem- The persons of the drama were originally colber,) 1402; and it closes with the defeat and lected by Mr. Rowe, who has given the title of death of Hotspur at Shrewsbury ; which en- Duke of Lancaster to Prince John, a mistake gagement happened on Saturday the 21st of July, which Shakspeare has been no where guilty of (ihe eve of Saint Mary Magdalen,) in the year in the first part of this play, though in the se1403. THEOBALD. cond he has fallen into the same error. King This play was first entered at Stationers' | Henry IV. was himself the last person that ever Hall, Feh. 25, 1597, by Andrew Wise. Again, bore the title of Duke of Lancaster. But all by M. Woolff, Jan. 9. 1598. For the piece his sons, (till they had peerages, as Clarence, supposed to have been its original, see Six old Bedford, Gloucester) were distinguished by the Plays on which Shakspeare founded, &c. pub- name of the royal house, as John of Lancaster, lished for S. Leacrost, Charing-Cross. Humphrey of Lancaster, &c. and in that proper STEEVENS. style, the present John (who became afterwards Shakspeare has apparently designed a regu- so illustrious by the title of Duke of Bedford) lar connection of these dramatic histories from is always mentioned in the play before us. Richard the Second to Henry the Fifth. King STEEVENS. Henry, at the end of Richard the Second, de- This comedy was written, I believe, in the clares his purpose to visit the Holy Land, which year 1597. Malone. KING HENRY IV. * PART I. I fancy every reader, when he ends this play, cries out with Desdemona, « » most lame and impotent.com.p3 As this play was not, to our knowledge, divided into acts by the author, I could be content to conclude it with the death of Henry the fourth : * In that Jerusalem shall Harry die. These scenes, which now inake the fifth act of Henry the Fourth, might then be the first of Henry the Fifth : but the truth is, they do not unite very commodiously to either play. When these plays were represented, I believe they ended as they are now ended in the books; but Shakspeare seems to have designed that the whole series of action, from the beginning of Richard the Second, to the end of Henry the Fifth, should be considered by the reader as one work, upon one plan, only broken into parts by the necessity of exhibition. None of Shakspeare's plays are more read than the First and Second Parts of Henry the Fourth. Perhaps no anthor has ever, in two plays, afforded so inuch delight. The great events are interesting, for the fate of kingdoms depend upon them; tbe stighter occurrences are diverting, and, except one or two, sufficiently probable; the incidents are multiplied with wonderful fertility of invention; and the characters diversified with the utmost nicety of discernment, and the profoundest skill in the nature of man. The prince, who is the hero both of the comic and tragic part, is a young man of great abilities, and violent Bat Falstaff! unimitated, uaimitable Falstaff! how shall I describe thee? thou compound of sense and vice ; of laughter, which is the more (reel indulged, as his wit is not of the splendid or ambitious kind, but consists in easy scapes and sallies of levity, which make sport, but raise no envy. It must be observed, that he is stained with no enormous or sanguinary crimes, so that his licentiousness is not so offensive but thaf it may be borne for his mirth. The moral to be drawn from this representation is, that no man is more dangerous than he that, with a will to corrupt, hath the power to please ; and that neither wit nor honesty ougbt to think themselves safe with such a companion, when they see Henry seduced by Falstati. Johnson. PERSONS REPRESENTED. KING HENRY THE FOURTH. SIR JOHN FALSTAFF. HENRY, Prince of Wales, POINS. Sons to the King. PRINCE JOHN Lancaster, GADSHILL, EARL OF WESTMORELAND, PETO, } Friends to the King. SIR WALTER BLUNT, BARDOLPH. LADY PERCY, Wife to Holspur, and Sister to Mor timer HENRY PERCY, surnamed HOTSPOR, his Son. EDMUND MORTIMER, Earl of March. LADY MORTIMER, Daughter to Giendower, and Wife to Mortimer. SCROOP. Archbishop of York. ARCHIBALD, Earl of Douglas. MRS. QU'ICKLY, Hostess of a Tavern in Eastcheap. OWEN GLENDOWER. Lords, Officers, SheriffVintner, Chamberlain, Drawers, Two Carriers, Travellers, and Attendants. ACT I. BLUNT, and others. To chase these pagans, in those holy fields, West. My liege, this haste was hot in question, post from Wales, loaden with heavy news, broil West. This, match'd with other, did, my gracions lored; |