Page images
PDF
EPUB

adapting it to the time of hop-picking, | or harvest in their various districts.

MR. W. E. FORSTER put it to the noble Lord whether children under 10 might be employed in hop-picking.

VISCOUNT SANDON intended that the clause should set free all children for six weeks in the year.

MR.W.E. FORSTER: Children under 10 as well?

VISCOUNT SANDON: Oh, certainly. There would be no danger in that.

MR. MUNDELLA wished to point out that in every other industry in the country except agriculture no child was to be employed under 10, and then he must be a half-timer until he was 13. Even then, if he did not come up to a certain Standard he must be half-timer until he was 14.

VISCOUNT SANDON said, that the difference between town and country was that in the latter six weeks were to be allowed for industrial operations. When the House remembered that the farmers had to deal with harvest, the uncertainty of the weather, and perishable crops, some allowance must be made or farming operations would come to an end. He proposed to make an alteration in the Amendment so as to substitute six weeks for eight, and otherwise to make it fit in with the rest of the Bill.

MR. BERESFORD HOPE, in accepting the noble Lord's suggestion, said, it was very desirable that the children should assist their parents in hop-picking. Generally speaking, it was better to localize employment so as to keep it in the hands of the respectable peasantry, or else the farmers would be obliged to rely upon a very different class from St. Giles's.

MR. MORLEY said, that managers of schools in the hop districts thought it quite necessary to limit the time children were employed in hop-picking.

MR. GREGORY said, that Colleges were closed and homes abandoned for the period.

MR. MUNDELLA suggested that the time of absence should not exceed eight weeks including holidays.

VISCOUNT SANDON could not accept the suggestion, but must abide by the Amendment in its present form.

MR. PEASE moved to report Progress, suggesting that the Government should take time to re-consider the clause.

Viscount Sandon

Motion made, and Question proposed, "That the Chairman do report Progress, and ask leave to sit again.”—(Mr. Pease.)

VISCOUNT SANDON said, he hoped the hon. Member would not press the Motion. The Committee had now discussed the question very fully, and, though there might be hon. Members who wished to speak, he thought a conclusion might be arrived at in a few minutes without re-opening the question to-morrow.

MR. W. E. FORSTER thought that if Progress were reported the end which the Government had in view would ultimately be more easily gained.

THE CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER was of opinion that the Amendment had been sufficiently debated, and he trusted the clause would be agreed to before Progress was reported, else it would be extremely inconvenient.

MR. CLARE READ said, in the harvest holidays the children were of very little use, for the farmers did not want them then, and the Amendment would only give the farmers the opportunity of employing the children about two weeks in the year.

MR. HAMOND said, they were debating this clause as if the object of the Bill were to provide labour for the farmers at the cheapest rate, and not to carry education to the rural districts.

Question put.

Noes 224: Majority 157.
The Committee divided:-Ayes 67;

MR. A. BROWN moved that the Chairman do leave the Chair.

Motion made, and Question proposed, "That the Chairman do now leave the Chair."—(Mr. Alexander Brown.)

THE CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER said, the Motion, if carried, would put an end to the Bill. He thought the question under consideration had been brought to a point which would admit of a decision.

MR. W. E. FORSTER believed the matter could not be disposed of so easily as the right hon. Gentleman supposed; but, under the circumstances, he hoped the Motion would not be pressed.

Question put.

The Committee divided:-Ayes 46; Noes 219 Majority 173.

MR. RYLANDS moved that Progress be reported.

Motion agreed to.

Committee report Progress; to sit again To-morrow, at Two of the clock.

PRISONS (SCOTLAND) BILL.

LEAVE. FIRST READING.

THE LORD ADVOCATE, in moving for leave to bring in a Bill for amending the Law relating to Prisons in Scotland, said: The prisons in Scotland are at present administered under the Prisons (Scotland) Administration Act, 1860 (23 & 24 Vict. c. 105.) They are divided into two classes, the first consisting of the general prison at Perth, and the second of the local prisons throughout the country. The general prison at Perth is administered by the prison managers for Scotland, four in number-namely, the Sheriff of Perthshire, the Crown Agent for Scotland, the Inspector of Prisons for Scotland, appointed under 5 & 6 Will. IV. c. 38, and the manager and secretary. The prison is administered under rules made by the Secretary of State, in terms of the Act of 1860. The Act itself also contains few detailed provisions on the subject. The Perth prison consists of a prison proper, or penal department, and an establishment for the criminal lunatics of Scotland, or lunatic department. The penal department is constituted for the reception of (1) prisoners sentenced to nine months' imprisonment and upwards, and (2) convicts under sentence of transportation or of penal servitude. Male convicts under sentence of penal servitude are at present detained in this prison only for the period of probation-nine months-unless on the occasion of an unexpected pressure upon the accommodation available in the convict prisons in England. The buildings of the general prison were originally erected in the beginning of the present century as a depôt for French prisoners. Large additions have been made to them from time to time, and a hospital is in course of erection. The number of cells is 743 in the penal department, and 58

was

in the lunatic department; but as that does not afford sufficient accommodation for all the prisoners appropriate for the general prison, the managers have contracted with the County Board of Ayrshire for the maintenance in the prison of Ayr of a certain number of female convicts during their period of probation -namely, 12 months-and with the County Board of Renfrewshire for the maintenance in the prison of Paisley of a certain number of male convicts during their period of probation. The net annual cost per prisoner in 1875, after the deduction of the profits of prisoners' labour was £20 118. 5d.; the average cost for the five years 1871-5 £20 128. In 1874 the prisoners' net earnings amounted to £3 6s., and in 1875 to £5 128. 2d. per head, the variation in other years being equally great; but the average of the five years 1871-5 was £3 138. 1d. Then as to the local prisons, they are administered by the County Boards elected annually in certain proportions set forth in the schedule to the Act of 1860 by the Commissioners of Supply of each county, and the magistrates of the larger towns within it. The County Boards are bound to provide sufficient accommodation for the prisoners within the district, and if they fail to do so the obligation may be enforced in a Court of Law. They are also bound to appoint and pay the necessary staff of prison officers, and to provide for the maintenance and removal of the prisoners under their jurisdiction. The prison officers hold their appointments at the pleasure of the Board, but the Secretary of State has also the power of dismissing any of them. The Secretary of State may order the discontinuance of any local prison, or may limit its use to certain classes of prisoners, the others being provided for elsewhere by the Board. No new prisons can be opened without his consent. The details of prison management are regulated by rules made by the Secretary of State in pursuance of the Act of 1860. These rules are binding on the County Boards, and their observance is the condition on which the grant of the Government is made towards the cost of maintenance of convicted prisoners. Certain latitude has hitherto been allowed in enforcing new rules, and at present several of the rules have been suspended by the County Boards subject to the deter

mination of the Secretary of State. Pending early legislation, the Secretary of State has delayed disposing of the suspensions; but if legislation is postponed, they must be disposed of. The prison assessments, amounting in 1875 to £46,000, and on the average of the five years ending 1875 to £41,000, are divided between the counties and the burghs in proportion to their respective rentals, and are paid in counties wholly by the owners, and in the burghs onehalf by owners and one-half by occupiers. The number of local prisons in Scotland has been gradually reduced since 1840, when, including all places of detention, it exceeded 200, and it now stands at 56, in addition to seven places at which police cells have been legalized by the Secretary of State as places in which convicted prisoners may be detained for periods not exceeding three days. In 1874 there were five prisons, of which the average daily population was less than one. Of these, one has since been closed. There were eight with an average population of one. Of these,

three have since been closed. There were 36 prisons in all whose population did not exceed 10; there were 16 between 10 and 50; two between 50 and 100; and three between 100 and 200. Above 200 there were two-namely, Glasgow with 739, and Edinburgh with 323. The waste of money involved is very great, and opportunities for using prison discipline and employing the prisoners in remunerative labour proportionately small. It is probable that an entire re-arrangement of the Scotch local prisons will be necessary, and the whole prison population of Scotland, which for the five years ending 1875 was on the average only 2,902 that is to say, 2,035 in the local prisons, 752 in the general prison at Perth, and 115 convicts in Ayr and Paisley-may be advantageously accommodated in a greatly reduced number of prisons placed at convenient points over the country. These prisons, it is obvious, will be much smaller than those contemplated for England; but the scattered nature of the population in Scotland renders this unavoidable. To obviate, as far as practicable, the inconvenience which will result from the reduction of the number of prisons, it is proposed to extend the operation of the provisions now in force for legalizing police cells as places of detention by legalizing them The Lord Advocate

for prisoners before trial and even for short periods after sentence, extending perhaps up to 10 or 14 days. These police cells would continue under the charge of the local police authorities; but the cost of maintaining and removing the prisoners would be repaid by the Government. The net annual cost of a prisoner in a local prison after deduction of the profit of prisoners' labour was in 1875, £20 18s. 6d., and the average for the five years ending 1875 was £21 158. In 1875, the prisoner's net earnings amounted to £1 16s. 11d. in the local prisons, as against £5 12s. 6d. in the general prison. The average of these earnings for the five years ending 1875 was £1 13s. 10d. in the local prisons, against £4 138. 1d. in the general prison. The Bill which it is now proposed to introduce is on the same general lines in most respects as the English Bill; but it differs from it in this respect-that it proposes to put the general prison at Perth, and the transferred local prisons, under the management of the same persons, subject, of course, to the Secretary of State. For this purpose it proposes to re-constitute the present prison managers in the manner set forth in the Bill. The management of the existing managers has been very satisfactory, and I gladly take the opportunity of specially referring to the able services of Dr. Hill Burton, the stipendiary manager. The Bill contains ample provisions for the transference of the local prisons, for their subsequent maintenance by the Government, for the continuance of the present prison officials, and the adjustment between the Government on the one hand, and the counties and burghs now represented on the Local Prison Boards on the other, of all questions as to obligations and assets of the local prisons. As by far the greater number of the clauses in the Act of 1860 and the various amending Acts are repealed by this measure, it has been thought the better course to repeal those Acts altogether, and to re-enact in the present Bill such of their clauses as it is desirable to keep in force. This renders the Scotch Bill somewhat longer than the English Bill. But it will be productive of very great convenience to all connected with prison management and discipline in Scotland. I beg to move for leave to introduce the Bill.

Motion agreed to.

Bill for amending the Law relating to Prisons | thousand pounds, for the completion of any in Scotland, ordered to be brought in by The Works which may be authorized by any Act of LORD ADVOCATE and Mr. Secretary CROSS. the present Session relating to the Improvement of the Harbour of Arklow, in the county of Wicklow.

BOW STREET POLICE COURT (SITE) BILL.

[EXPENSES OF COMMISSIONERS.]

Order for Committee read.

Motion made and Question put, "That Mr. Speaker do now leave the Chair."

The House divided:- Ayes 125; Noes 30: Majority 95.

Main Question, "That Mr. Speaker do now leave the Chair," put, and agreed to.

Matter considered in Committee.

(In the Committee.)

Resolved, That it is expedient to authorise the payment, out of moneys to be provided by Parliament, of all Expenses incurred by the Commissioners of Works under the provisions of any Act of the present Session relating to the acquisition of a Site in Bow Street for the erection of a new Police Court and Police Station and Offices.

Resolution to be reported To-morrow, at Two of the clock.

Motion made, and Question proposed, "That the Select Committee on the Bow Street Police Court (Site) Bill do consist of Five Members, Three to be nominated by the House, and Two to be nominated by the Committee of Selection." Debate arising.

Motion made, and Question put, "That the Debate be now adjourned."-(Captain Nolan.) The House divided:-Ayes 8; Noes 92: Majority 84.

Original Question put.

Ordered, That the Select Committee on the Bow Street Police Court (Site) Bill do consist of Five Members, Three to be nominated by the House, and Two to be nominated by the Committee of Selection.

Colonel BLACKBURNE, Mr. SPENCER STANHOPE, and Mr. RICHARD SMYTH accordingly

nominated Members of the Committee.

Ordered, That all Petitions presented against the Bill be referred to the Committee on the Bill, provided such Petitions are presented one clear day before the Meeting of the Committee; and that such of the Petitioners as pray to be heard by themselves, their Counsel, or agents, be heard upon their Petitions, if they think fit, and Counsel heard in favour of the Bill against the said Petitions:-That the Committee have power to send for persons, papers, and records; That Three be the quorum. (Mr. William Henry Smith.)

[blocks in formation]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

METROPOLITAN BOARD OF WORKS (MONEY)

BILL.

On Motion of Mr. WILLIAM HENRY SMITH, Bill for further amending the Acts relating to the raising of money by the Metropolitan Board of Works; and for other purposes, ordered to be brought in by Mr. WILLIAM HENRY SMITH and Mr. CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER.

ADJOURNMENT.

Motion made, and Question put, "That this House do now adjourn.". (Sir Michael Hicks-Beach.)

The House divided:-Ayes 68; Noes 11 Majority 57.

before Three o'clock.

distance, and to leave out ("outer boundary of the town") and insert

("Town hall, or if there shall be no town hall, then from the cathedral or church if there shall be only one church, or if there be more churches than one, then from the principal market place of such town.")

THE DUKE OF RICHMOND AND House adjourned at a quarter GORDON said, he understood the object of the noble Duke in proposing the Amendment was that there should. be some definite point laid down in the Bill from which the measurement should be taken, so as to remove uncertainty. He agreed that that was desirable; but he was not altogether satisfied with the words suggested by the noble Duke, which might possibly be improved. If the noble Duke would now withdraw the Amendment he would consider the matter before the Report.

HOUSE OF LORDS,

Friday, 14th July, 1876.

MINUTES.]-PUBLIC BILLS-First Reading-
Isle of Man (Officers)* (174); Turnpike Acts
Continuance (175).

Second Reading-Elver Fishing* (164); Public
Works Loans (167).

*

Committee Commons (137-176.) Committee-Report-Settled Estates Act (1856) Amendment * (151) Customs Duties Consolidation (162); Customs Laws Consolidation* (163). Report-Merchant Shipping (160-177); Local Government Board's Provisional Orders Confirmation (Chelmsford, &c.) * (161)—(Artizans and Labourers Dwellings)* (127). Third Reading-County of Peebles Justiciary District (Scotland) * (158), and passed.

COMMONS BILL-(No. 139.)
(The Lord President.)

COMMITTEE.

House in Committee (according to
Order.)

PART I.-LAW AS TO THE REGULATION
AND INCLOSURE OF COMMONS.
Applications in relation to commons.
Clauses 1 to 7, inclusive, agreed to.

Suburban Commons.

Clause 8 (Sanitary authorities to be represented in the case of commons in the neighbourhood of towns.)

THE DUKE OF NORTHUMBERLAND, after explaining that the last section of the clause stated that

"The population of any town for the purposes of this Act shall be reckoned upon the last published census for the time being, and distances shall be measured in a direct line from the outer boundary of the town to the nearest point of the suburban common,"

moved an Amendment to substitute "four" miles for "six" as the limit of

re

THE EARL OF KIMBERLEY marked that the Metropolitan Commons Act was much more stringent than that clause, because it did not allow any common within 15 miles from the centre of London to be inclosed. He did not know why other towns were to be treated on a different principle. The Bill had been announced as a compromise on this question; but if the advantages conferred by the Bill were to be taken away little by little, the Government might be able to carry their measure, but it would not be accepted as a compromise, and the whole question would be re-opened.

THE DUKE OF SOMERSET observed that the case of the Metropolis in respect of commons was altogether exceptional.

THE LORD CHANCELLOR pointed out that the one question before the Committee was whether they should have a constantly shifting boundary or one fixed central point in a town from which to measure the six miles.

EARL FORTESCUE said, that if the boundary of the borough was to be deemed the boundary of the town, it was only reasonable that there should be some better definition of the boun

dary than that given in the Bill. Some municipal boroughs had their boundaries quite in the country. For instance, a small river in his deer park was the boundary of a small borough several miles distant. He would himself be quite unaffected by the Act, but he thought that there should be some better

« PreviousContinue »