LATE SCHOLAR OF LINCOLN COLLEGE, OXFORD; AND ASSISTANT MASTER IN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE SCHOOL. LONDON: WALTON AND MABERLY, UPPER GOWER STREET, AND IVY LANE, PATERNOSTER ROW. 1858.. PREFACE. CORRECTIONS. 18. Regard quod in this construction as that of hoc in hoc I. Tetr. 291 Tr. Tetr. I. Trim. 511 512. Note, that the vowel of the suffix to the nom. and acc. of the second or o declension is printed o after v and u: Davos, salvos, quom. TEKENCE with comparative ease. The student is referred to the same work as the most valuable contribution to the system of crude forms which we possess. These forms are largely, though not universally, adopted in the notes to this edition. But there can be little doubt that this simple and admirable method must eventually supersede the older and less reasonable views of word-building'still generally entertained. It may not be improper to remark that the text of BENTLEY is received with little alteration by VOLLBEHR; every emendation of importance since the older editors being due, as far as This edition of the Andria being intended for the use of Upper Classes in Schools, and Students reading for Matriculation, the explanations of the scenes are given somewhat at length. A readier facility in seizing the constructions of a text is obtained by a preliminary acquaintance with its substance. The translated passages are more numerous than may be considered necessary or advisable; but students of TERENCE will use translations, and more will still be found left to exercise their industry than would perhaps be the case if meagre assistance were afforded to them. I have derived much advantage from Mr. PARRY's edition in the BIBLIOTHECA CLASSICA ; but I am especially, though indirectly, indebted to Professor Key, whose excellent Grammar will enable those who have studied it attentively to read TERENCE with comparative ease. The student is referred to the same work as the most valuable contribution to the system of crude forms which we possess. These forms are largely, though not universally, adopted in the notes to this edition. But there can be little doubt that this simple and admirable method must eventually supersede the older and less reasonable views of word-building' still generally entertained. It may not be improper to remark that the text of BENTLEY is received with little alteration by VOLLBEHR ; every emendation of importance since the older editors being due, as far as |