position to his former patron, Barnabas, who preached Jesus Christ, but not crucified. The Basilidians, in the very beginning of Christianity, in like manner denied that Christ was crucified, and asserted that it was Simon of Cyrene, who was crucified in his place: which account of the matter stood its ground from the first to the seventh century, and was the form in which Christianity presented itself to the mind of Mahomet, who, after instructing us how the Virgin Mary conceived by smelling a rose, tells us, that "the Jews devised a stratagem against him, but God devised a stratagem against them, and God is the best deviser of stratagems." "The malice of his enemies aspersed his reputation, and conspired against his life, but their intention only was guilty, a phantom or a criminal was substituted on the cross, and the innocent Jesus was translated into the seventh heaven."* So much for the evidence of the Crucifixion of Christ! HERETICS WHO DENIED CHRIST'S RESURRECTION. In like manner, we have a long list of sincerely-professing Christians down from the earliest times, who denied the resurrection of Christ. Theodoret informs us of Cerinthus, who was contemporary with the Apostle John and his followers, and that he held and taught that Christ† suffered and was crucified, but that he did not rise from the tomb: but that he will rise when there shall be a general resurrection. Philaster says of him that he taught that men should be circumcised, and observe the Sabbath, and that Christ was not yet risen from the dead, only he announces that he will rise. Had the Christ of the Gospels been really the founder of the Christian religion, certainly it would be incumbent on all Christians to be circumcised as he was, and to observe that Jewish law only, which he observed, and which he was so far from abrogating, that he declared that "heaven and earth should pass away ere one jot or one tittle of that law," should be dispensed with.-Matt. v. 18. Our modern religionits are Paulites: The Jews alone are the followers of the example and religion of JESUS. * See the Koran, C. iii. v. 53, and C. iv. v. 156, of Maracci's edition. † Χριστον πεπονθεναι και εσταυρώσθαι : μηπω διεγηγερθαι : μελλειν δε ανίστασθαι οταν η καθόλου γενμται νεκρων αναστασις. + Docet autem circumcidi et sabbatizare et Christum nondum resurrexisse a mortuis sed, resurrecturum annunciat.-Lardner, vol. 4, p. 368, The Cerinthians, The Valentinians, The Markosians, The Manichees, Stand in the long and never interrupted succession of Christians who denied the Resurrection of Christ. I have heard of one of the most popular and distinguished preachers among the Unitarians, who, upon being homely pressed with the question as to where he believed the body of Jesus Christ might at this moment be, pointed with his finger to the turf, and looked vastly droll, in intimation of his concurrence in that orthodox belief, so sublimely expressed in the epitaphs we stumble on in Deptford church-yard: against which, I believe there never was an infidel yet, who could bring a rational objection. "Go home, dear friends, dry up your tears, Here we shall lie, till Christ appears, And when he comes we hope to have As the whole amount of the internal evidence for the alleged fact of the Gospel, it may then be fairly stated, that in contravention of the clear understanding of the mystical nature of the whole Mythos, which those who bear the brand of heresy have given us-while a thousand expressions in the writings of the orthodox themselves confirm that understanding: not so much as any two continuous sentences can be adduced from any pen that wrote within a hundred years of the supposed death and resurrection of Christ, which are such as any writer whatever would have written, had he himself believed that such events had really occurred. CHAPTER XLV. THE WHOLE OF THE EXTERNAL EVIDENCE OF THE PALEY, in his Hore Paulinæ, with that consummate ingenuity which might be expected from a clergyman who could not afford to have a conscience, has contrived to substitute a very plausible and indeed convincing evidence of the existence and character of Paul of Tarsus, for a presumptive evidence of the truth of Christianity. The instances of evidently-undesigned coincidence between the Epistles of Paul, and the history of him contained in the Acts of the Apostles, are indeed irrefragible: and make out the conclusion to the satisfaction of every fair inquirer, that neither those epistles, nor that part of the Acts of the Apostles are suppositious. The hero of the one is unquestionably the epistoler of the other; both writings are therefore genuine to the full extent of every thing that they purport to be, neither are the Epistles forged, nor is the history, as far as it relates to St. Paul, other than a faithful and a fair account of a person who really existed, and acted the part therein ascribed to him. TESTIMONY OF LUCIAN. Lucian, in his dialogue entitled Philopatris, speaks of a Galilean with a bald forehead and a long nose, who was carried, (or rather pretended that he had been carried) to the third heaven, and speaks of his hearers as a set of tatterdemalions almost naked, with fierce looks, and the gait of madmen, who moan and make contortions; swearing by the son who was begotten by the father; predicting a thousand misfortunes to the empire, and cursing the Emperor. I have far greater pleasure in quoting the unexceptionable TESTIMONY OF LONGINUS. Longinus Dionysius Cassius, who had been Secretary to Zenobia Queen of Palmyra, and died A. D. 273, in his enumeration of the most distinguished characters of Greece; after naming Demosthenes, Lysias, Eschines, Aristides, and others, concludes, and "add to these Paul of Tarsus, whom I consider to be the first setter-forth of an unproved doctrine."* This testimony is, indeed, very late in time, and extends a very little way; but let it avail as much as it may avail, there can be no, doubt (whether Christianity be received or rejected) that Paul was a most distinguished and conspicuous metaphysician, who lived and wrote about the time usually assigned, and that those Epistles which go under his name in the New Testament, are in good faith, (and even with less alteration than many other writings of equal antiquity have undergone) such as he either penned or dictated. Should any sincere and upright believer in * Προς τούτους Παυλος ο Ταρδευς οντινα και πρωτον φημι προισταμενον δογματος avaлodeixтov.-Eur. Magazine. the Christian religion, instead of reviling and insulting the author of this work, or going about to increase and extend the horrors of that unjust imprisonment, of which this work has been the chief solace-set himself ably and conscientiously to the business of showing that from an admission of the genuineness and authenticity of St. Paul's Epistles, and of the reality of the character and part ascribed to him in the Acts of the Apostles, (always excepting the miraculous) the existence of Jesus Christ as a man, and the general credibility of the gospel history would follow; he would deserve well of the Christian community, and of all men who wish to see truth triumphant over prejudice, ignorance, and error. THE TESTIMONY OF PHLEGON. This has long ago been given up as an egregious monkish forgery, no longer tenable; nor indeed is it ever adduced by our more modern and rational divines. Mr. Gibbon, in his caustic and expressive style, says, "the celebrated passage of Phlegon is now wisely abandoned;" but as he has not quoted it, and I find it, standing its ground in the celebrated Dr. Clarke's Evidences of Natural and Revealed Religion, I have thought it worthy of transcription in this place. This it is, 66 In the fourth year of the two hundred and second Olympiad, there was an eclipse of the sun greater than any ever known before; and it was night at the sixth hour of the day, so that even the stars appeared, and there was a great earthquake in Bythinia, that overthrew several houses in Nice." THE PASSAGE OF MACROBIUS. "When Augustus had heard that among the children in Syria, whom Herod, King of the Jews, had ordered to be slain under two years of age, his own son was also killed, he remarked that it was better to be Herod's hog than his son."+ * Decline and Fall, chap. 15, ad calcem. † Τεταρτω δ' ετει της διακοσιοστης δευτερας ολυμπιαδος, εγενετο εκλειπσις ηλιου, μεγιστη των εγνωρισμένων πρότερον, και νυξ ωρα εκτη της ημερας εγενετο ώστε και αστερας εν ουρανω φανηναι, και σεισμος.κ. Το λο Cum audisset (Augustus) inter pueros quos in Syria, Herodes rex Judæorum intra bimatum jussit interfici, filium quoque ejus occisum, ait," Melius est Herodis porcum esse quam filium."-Macrobius, lib. 2. c. 4.-Clarke 355. There is no occasion to be prolix in comment upon a passage, which though urged by Dr. Clarke, and some of our earlier Christian evidence writers, is regarded generally by Christians themselves as somewhat below the line of respectability. It is not adduced by Eusebius who is ridiculously diffuse on the slaughter of the children in Bethlehem, and who would have made much of it, had it been known to him. The probability is, that Macrobius might have recorded, such a saying of Augustus, with respect to some unnatural father, or even of Herod himself, whose cruelty to his own family was but little inferior to that of the evangelical Constantine; and some of the Monkish Radiurgs, or dexterously-forging scribes, might have thought it a good exploit, to fit it with the occasion. The whole passage of St. Matthew's Gospel, which relates the story of the slaughter of the innocents, is mark ed in the improved version of the New Testament, as of doubtful authority; and is included among some of the facts, of which the Unitarian editors of that version, say in their note, that they have a fabulous appearance. I cannot possibly treat this delicate subject with greater delicacy, than by possessing my readers of the judgment which a learned, intelligent, and sincere believer in the Christian religion, has passed upon it. "Josephus and the Roman historians give us particular accounts of the character of this Jewish king, who receiv ed his sovereign authority from the Roman Emperor, and inform us of other acts of cruelty which he was guilty of in his own family; but of this infamous inhuman butchery, which to this day remains unparralleled in the annals of tyranny, they are entirely silent. Under such circumstances, if my eternal happiness depended upon it, I could not believe it true. But though I readily exclaim with Horace, non ego, I cannot add, as he does, credat Judæus Apella ;§ for I am confident, there is no Jew that reads this chapter, who does not laugh at the ignorant credulity of those professed Christians, who receive such gross, palpable falsehoods for the inspired word of God, and lay the foundation of their religion upon such incredible fictions as these."¶ *Eccles. Hist. lib. 1, c. 9. Not I! † Ραδιουργοι § Let the Jew Apelles believe! Il Surely this professed Christian had not the fear of OAKHAM before his eyes. ¶ Reverend Edward Evanson's Dissonance of the Gospels. Ed Ipswich 1792, p. 126. |