9.

l.g.

Dr Butler's Charge, 4: 1882.
whole text of Ser. recoverable from the fathers.
some limitation recessary. Brit. brit. aug. p.114.

12 Ostensible Editor, who? Carlile of Heart & Hone, See,
said to be Belsham.

19.

real lor

I doubt whether I understand him. Does he mean
he has no doubt the Saved Vol. was collected before
any part of these apocryphal books existed, except
possibly, Sp. of Clement, & that his own opinion is
the vol, was collected before that Ep.

was written?

Wake places this Epr. betw. A.D. 64 & 7o. Introd. p.12.8.19. 2.9 Genuineness of apostolical fathers, in many cases 830. doubtful & in one highly questionable. Not 10

Abf. Wake's

I can

Landly

Gospels)

view them

a close iration." he New

from a

; written

ver saw

is Visit

cidence

30 3%, whether generine or not be when they depart from news of the model & language &c. as ever" closely copping" them, except as to the general form of Epistles in those days, as those of Cicero &c. but giving sober Christian advice, & quoting script. as we quote it, conscious all along that they themselves merely uninspired ministers of the

Gospel.

are

4.15 gathered
- to the harvest of the blessed."
22. " called to his great reward" I think neither
Scripture nor the sober modesty of our best di-
vixes authorises us to speak this, even of the
best of men. A similar apertion in a new epitaph
(atmalphs) was rointed out to me
15.5. iv. 6" "Iv. 16."
as unusual & offensive.

8. §.3. l. 4. "need" 2. reeds"

15. St. James ii plainly referring to sePaul's Epp. 19. 5. "Revelations"♪

delivery

ay, that

ation to

ry, who

eful, the general

a close piration."

the New

a from a

s written

ever saw

his Visit

views of

incidence

delivery

say, that

▲tation to

ary, who seful, the

r general