Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

"Be not thou envious against evil men, neither desire to be with them.”—Prov. xxiv. 1.

THESE words lead us to make a remark on two points

I. THE VILLAINY OF SIN. Here is a description of sinners: Their heart studieth destruction, and their lips talk of mischief." Malignity is the very essence of sin. All sinners are of their father, the devil.

First: Their "study" is destruction. Destroy what? chastity, truth, moral sensibility, spiritual goodness, &c. Every wicked man in his measure is an Apollyon; like his great leader he goes about seeking whom he may devour.

Secondly: Their speech is mischief.

tends to destroy social order, to create social brawls, to set man against man, family against family, nation against nation. Sin is a destroyer. This is its instinct. This is its influence. Holy Scripture describes the genius and history of sinners.

Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips." It is said that when Nicephorus Phocas had built a strong wall about his palace for his own security, in the night-time he heard a voice crying to him, "O Emperor! though thou build thy wall as high as the clouds, yet if sin be within, it will overthrow all."

66

II. THE ABSURDITY OF SIN. "Be thou not envious against evil men, neither desire to be with them." Two things are here implied, showing the absurdity of sin.

First: That sin envies the most unenviable things. Envy is essentially a bad passion. The poets imagine that envy dwelt in a dark cave, being pale and lean, looking a-squint, abounding with gall, her teeth black, never rejoicing but in the misfortune of others, ever unquiet, and continually tormenting herself. But this feeling is garbed with absurdity when it is directed to evil men. To envy evil men is to envy those whose natures are charged with the elements of misery, over whom the clouds of God's disfavour rest, and for whom a terrible retribution waits.

Secondly: That sin desires

the Their conversation

For Illustration, see "Pulpit and its Handmaids," page 59.

most undesirable things. "Neither desire to be with them." To be in the fellowship of wicked men, to breathe their

fætid breath, to listen to their foul talk and bacchanalian song, to join in their senseless revelries, is in every way a most undesirable thing, and yet, alas! it is desired-desired by the thousands of youth who are rising into manhood. Sin is a great deceiver, it is always theatrical; it puts on dazzling costumes that attract and charm the uninitiated. We have read of a tree which, like the almond tree, robes itself in blossoms before the foliage appears. Its flowers are a gorgeous ruby, and their splendour attracts to it in teeming crowds the winged insects of the air. The busy bee in quest of nectar is attracted to it, settles down for a moment,

and amidst its encircled beauty drinks its cup and falls dead to the root. Around that tree we are told there lie the remains of myriads of insects who have fallen victims to a fatal delusion. Is not sin like that tree? In the great fields of human society how high it lifts its head, how wide its branches, how brilliant its blossoms! Human souls, fascinated by its external glory, and by its promise of delicious nectar, hasten to it, crowd around it, settle on it, sip its juicy flowers, and fall dead.

CONCLUSION. Beware of sin. Flee from it as Lot from Sodom, and thus escape for your life.

The Pulpit and its Handmaids.

THE SERVICE OF LOVE (vide p. 28).-Thou knowest what Jacob felt when he served seven years for Rachel, and they seemed unto him but a few days, for the love he had to her. A Gospel spirit does the same to God-love makes long service short, and hard service easy. Nothing is pain which love does. And this is Gospel obedience. It is faith working by love which refines duty into a grace-the commandments are exalted into privileges-ordinances become happy means of fellowship with God.-ROMAINE.

FAITH AND WORKS.-It was an unhappy division that has been made between faith and works. Though in my intellect I may divide them, just as

in the candle I know there is
both light and heat; but yet,
put out the candle, and they
are both gone; one remains
not without the other. So it
is betwixt faith and works;
nay, in a right conception, fides
est opus.
If I believe a thing
because I am commanded, that
is opus.-SELDEN.

Not that I would ascribe anything to a lazy, speculative, and barren faith, in opposition to that lively and active one which is called by the Apostle mioTIS δὲ ἀγάπης ἐνεργοιμένη (faith operat ing by love), since I am told hy St. James, that the divorce of faith and works is as destructive to religion as that of soul and body is to life; but that I was willing to mind you that

* For Illustration, see “Pulpit and its Handmaids," page 60.

though true faith (which cries, like Rachel, “Give me children, or else I die,") be ever the pregnant mother of good works, yet are not those works the cause, but the effects and signs of God's first love to him (however afterward the children may nurse their parents).

As, though the needles pointing at the poles be, by being an effect, an argument of its having been invigorated by the loadstone, or received the influence from some other magnetic body, yet it is not that respect unto the worth the cause, but the operation, the irons being drawn by the attractive mineral.BOYLE.

STRIFE FOR THE HEART (vide p. 54).-There is such strife for the heart as there was for Moses' body. "Give it me," saith the Lord. "Give it me," saith the tempter. "Give it me," saith the Pope. "Give it me," saith riches. "Give it me,'

saith

pleasure: as though thou must needst give it. Now, here is the choice-whether thou wilt give it to God or the devil. God's heart, or the devil's heart -whose wilt thou be?

Thus

doth man hang in a balance, like a young virgin which hath many suitors. Some she fancieth for their parentage, some for personage, some for friends, some for wealth, some for wit, some for virtue; and after all, chooseth the worst of all. So the heart hath many suitors besides God; that sometimes she marrieth with one, sometimes with another. The world keeps her, the flesh keeps her, the devil keeps her, which have no more interest in her than Herod to his sister, but seek her spoil; like them that marry for riches,

are glad when one dies, that another may come. His suitors are like Absalom, who did not seek the hearts of the people, like David, but stole them with flattery and lies.-HENRY SMITH.

DRINKING (vide p. 57).-At an Episcopal Convention, a discussion on temperance brought up the "wine question." An influential clergyman arose, and made a vehement argument in favour of wine. When he had resumed his seat, a layman said, "Mr. Moderator, it is not my purpose in rising, to answer the learned argument you have just listened to. My object is more humble, and, I hope, more practical. I once knew a father, in moderate circumstances, who was at much inconvenience to educate a beloved son at college. Here this son became dissipated; but after he had graduated and returned to his father, the influence acting upon a generous nature actually reformed him. The father was overjoyed at the prospect that his cherished hopes were still to be realized. Several years passed, when the young man, having completed his professional study, and being about to leave his father to establish in business, he was invited to dine with a neighbouring clergyman, distinguished for his hospitality and social qualities. At this dinner wine was introduced and offered to this young man, who refused; pressed upon him, and again refused. This was repeated, and the young man ridiculed; peculiar abstinence. The young man was strong enough to overcome appetite, but he could not resist ridicule. He drank, and fell, and from that moment be

came a confirmed drunkard, and long since has found a drunkard's grave. Mr. Moderator," continued the old man, with streaming eyes, "I am that father, and it was at the table of the clergyman who has just taken his seat, and my son, I shall never cease to mourn."

CLOYING PLEASURE (vide p. 58). A philosopher in an epistle which he writes to a man from the court of Dionysius, where he was forcibly detained, thus bemoans himself. "We are unhappy, O Antisthenes, beyond measure! and how can we but be unhappy, that are burdened by the tyrant every day with sumptuous feasts, plentiful compotations, precious ornaments, gorgeous apparel? and I knew as soon as I came into this island and city, how unhappy my life would be." This is the nature and common condition of even the most pleasing sensible objects. They first tempt, then please a little, then disappoint, and lastly, vex. The eye that beholds them blasts them quickly, rifles and deflowers their glory, and views them with no more delight at first, than disdain afterwards. Creature enjoyments have a bottom; are soon drained and drawn dry. Hence, there must be frequent diversions and their pleasures must be sought out, and are chosen, not because they are

better, but because they are new. -JOHN Howe.

IMPULSIVE SPIRITUAL LIFE (vide p. 26).-You may galvanize a paralysed limb, and, by galvanism, may restore the circulation, and so restore life to it; but the galvanism is not the life-it only rouses the dormant powers of life. Galvanism 18 a certain development of electricity - the same mysterious agent which, in another form, darts to and fro among the clouds of heaven. The life of the limb, on the other hand, consists in its answering the purposes for which it was made-in its habitual subservience to the will, in the power of contracting and relaxing its muscles when the will gives its notice to do so. Now, the professing Christian who is not spiritually alive is a paralysed member of the body of Christ. Impulses from a heavenly agent, the Holy Ghost, are ever and anon sent through the medium of God's ordinances in the body of Christ, and impart a convulsive, fitful motion even to those limbs which are paralysed. It does not, however, follow that the paralysed limbs are restored. In some cases they may be-in some they may not. At all events, the fitful movement of the limb is one thing, its permanent vitality another.-DR. GOULBURN.

Literary Notices.

[We hold it to be the duty of an Editor either to give an early notice of the books sent to him for remark, or to return them at once to the Publisher. It is unjust to praise worthless books; it is robbery to retain unnoticed ones.]

THE REVIEWER'S CANON.

In every work regard the author's end,

Since none can compass more than they intend.

A COMMENTARY, CRITICAL, EXPERIMENTAL, AND PRACTICAL, ON THE OLD AND NEW TESTAMENTS. By the Revs. ROBERT JAMIESON, D.D., A. R. FAUSSET, A.M., and DAVID BROWN, D.D. Vols. I to VI. Glasgow: William Collins, Sons, and Co. Price £3, 12s.

HERE are six handsome volumes of Biblical exegesis, taking up the whole Scriptures from Genesis to Revelations. Three of them, embracing the Old Testament from Job to Malachi, and the New from the Acts of the Apostles to Revelations, are from the pen of the Rev. A. R. Fausset, of St. Cuthbert's, York. Two, extending from Genesis to Esther inclusive, are the productions of Rev. Dr. Jamieson, of St. Paul's, Glasgow. The other volume, containing an exposition of all the Gospels, is from the pen of Dr. Browne, Professor of Theology, Aberdeen. Whatever may be the difference in the ability of the authors and the merit of their respective works, they all agree in theological sentiment, and are all men of high culture, right Biblical scholarship, and reverence for the Divine Word. They have unitedly produced a Biblical Commentary, which, taken as a whole, is without a rival or a match. Their introductions to the various Books are specially valuable, inasmuch as they deal with the objections which modern rationalism has put forth with great pertinacity and power. In the department of exegesis, each writer, whilst showing himself perfectly acquainted with the interpretation of previous expositors, and with the various emendative renderings of the text expounded, is manifestly independent. They look at facts with their own eyes, they weigh evidence in their own balance. We do not think that another Commentary of this kind will be required, for another generation at least. It has done work which Matthew Henry, Adam Clarke, Scott, and others who have written on the whole Bible have not done-were, for want of materials, unable to do, and, in the circumstances of their age, not required to do. Our young brethren who are looking out for a Commentary, and beginning to furnish their libraries, must not overlook this work. It is in every respect well got up; it is remarkably cheap, and will prove an invaluable aid to every man who is in earnest quest of the real meaning of a text.

OLD TRUTHS IN NEW FORMS: Three Lectures Delivered in the Poultry Chapel, London. By JOSEPH PARKER, D.D. London: Hurren, Poultry Chapel House, Cheapside.

« PreviousContinue »