THE STATE ACADEMIES OF SCIENCE AFFILIATED WITH THE AMER

ICAN ASSOCIATION1

SINCE the New Hampshire Academy of Science is now affiliated with the American Association for the Advancement of Science and is advancing shoulder to shoulder with twenty other affiliated state academies, it seems worth while to learn what these other organizations have accomplished and in what activities they are at present engaged. This address presents some of the results of a study of those questions.

Brief statements concerning the organization and work of sixteen of the affiliated academies were published in the last volume of "Summarized Proceedings of the American Association" (1921-1925), which appeared in December, 1925. Since that time five additional academies have become affiliated with the association.2 In preparation for the study here reported, a questionnaire of eighteen specific questions was sent to the secretaries of all the academies in this group, excepting our own, and all but two of the twenty secretaries responded, some of them sending additional information about their academies. That the secretaries were keenly interested in the study is shown by the receipt of many publications from fourteen academies. Several of the secretaries expressed a desire to receive the results of the detailed study of the material collected.

Academies affiliated with the American Association exist in the following states: Alabama, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Reference to the map shows that these states form a group extending from the Atlantic Ocean to the Mississippi River, with an arm extending from Iowa through Nebraska and Kansas to Oklahoma. The region south and west of the last named states has no affiliated academies at present, partly because it is covered by the Pacific Division and the Southwestern Division of the American Asso

1 From the address of the retiring president of the New Hampshire Academy of Science, delivered at Waterville, N. H., June 4, 1927.

2 A sixth additional academy (of South Carolina) became affiliated October 17, 1927. There are twenty-two in all.

ciation. Some of the states in the regions of these two divisions have unaffiliated academies, as is also true with several other states outside of the regions of the divisions.

Of the twenty-one academies to be studied, sixteen have as their titles the name of the state followed by the words Academy of Science. These apparently take science to cover most of the field of classified knowledge and orderly thinking. Three Three use the phrase Academy of Sciences, thinking apparently of the cooperation and coordination of the separate fields into which science is too often or too definitely split up; these three academies are those of Maryland, Nebraska, and Louisiana, the last-named of which takes the name of the New Orleans Academy of Sciences. The two remaining academies add two other fields of intellectual effort. They are the Michgan Academy of Science, Arts and Letters, and the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters.

The New Orleans Academy is the oldest of the twenty-one present organizations, having been formed in 1853, and the Alabama Academy is the youngest, formed in 1924. There seem to have been three active periods of academy formation; three academies were formed in 1866-1870, five in 1885-1894, and eleven in 1902-1924. There seem to have been

obvious though slightly less well defined active periods of academy formation in the years following the civil war and directly after the world war. Historians may see some significance in this last observation. The Iowa Academy of Science was organized in 1887, though it succeeded the Iowa Academy of Sciences which lived from 1875-1880. The Maryland Academy of Sciences was reorganized in 1866, as the successor of the Maryland Academy of Science and Literature, which was itself a reorganization in 1819 of the Academic Society, formed in 1797. To the Maryland Academy belongs the credit of being the pioneer in this field.

In this connection it should be mentioned that the formation of the New Hampshire Academy of Science in 1919 occurred at the suggestion of Dr. J. McKeen Cattell, editor of SCIENCE, the initial steps in the actual organization having been taken by a committee consisting of Professor John H. Gerould, Professor Norman E. Gilbert, and Dr. John M. Gile, of Hanover, with the cooperation of Professor W. C.

8 The Pacific Division now includes all members of the association residing in Alaska, British Columbia, Washington, Oregon, California, Idaho, Nevada, Utah, Mexico (excepting Sonora and Chihuahua), the Hawaiian and the Philippine Islands and other islands of the Pacific. The Southwestern Division now includes all members residing in Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, Sonora, Chihuahua and Texas west of the Pecos River.

O'Kane, Dr. Charles James, and Mr. H. L. Howes, of Durham. This was the outcome of a plan of the American Association to cooperate with the state academies of science and to encourage their foundstion in states where they did not already exist. Dr. Cattell was one of the leaders in bringing about the arrangements for the official affiliation of state academies with the American Association, arrangements that began to operate in 1918.*

The number of members enrolled varies from fifty for New Orleans to about eight hundred for Maryland and for Indiana. The small size of the firstnamed academy is doubtless due to its being largely local and limited to research workers. The number of members apparently bears no relation to the age of an academy; it may depend on the population of the state, on entrance requirements or some other factor. It should be noticed, however, that the three academies having the largest enrolment include nonresident members.

The classification of members seems to be governed by no general principle; in fact, there is much confusion here. There are three academies (Alabama, Georgia, and New Orleans) with only one kind of members (active members), and there is one (Maryland) with six kinds (corresponding, associate and corporate members, fellows, patrons and founders). Examination of the complete list reveals these additional kinds: local, national, life, non-resident, annual, honorary and regular members, honorary fellows and life fellows. New Hampshire stands alone in having only two kinds, active and honorary members, with Michigan a close second, adding life members to the two kinds we have. Four academies have national

members, meaning persons who are also members of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. All the academies have members with the standing of our own active members, though they are sometimes designated by different names. Thirteen have less than five kinds of members. Two have six kinds. Confusion is greatest in those cases where & member may belong to two different classifications; e.g., the Oklahoma Academy has active members and fellows, and each of these may be either local or national; it also has honorary members. Seven of the academies list non-resident members, usually former active members who have moved from the state. Twelve academies have honorary members, or members of similar standing. The limitations to this honor are interesting. For New Hampshire the number is limited to ten, with a total enrolment of

4 For a list of the first academies to be affiliated and the dates of their affiliation, see SCIENCE for June 17,

1921.

131; for Kentucky the number is twenty, with an enrolment of 170, and for Ohio it is only twenty-five, with a total of 475. The other academies have, according to their constitutions, placed no limits on the number of honorary members. It is surprising that two (Kentucky and Ohio) confer this honor only on non-resident members; formerly the Nebraska Academy had a similar rule but rescinded the nonresident condition in 1920. Two academies (Michigan and Wisconsin) confer honorary membership for distinguished or conspicuous service in science, arts or letters, while one (Tennessee) confers this honor on "any white person who has attained prominence in any department of science."

The classification of members has apparently been established to meet local needs in each case. The multiplicity of names seems unfortunate, particularly as different names are sometimes used by different academies to designate the same kind of members. Simplification of nomenclature seems desirable and should make easier that correspondence between affiliated academies which is appearing so promisingly on the horizon, in connection with official affiliation with the American Association. It is suggested that the affiliated academies might, in cooperation with the American Association, bring classification of membership and the nomenclature thereof into closer agreement.

The payment of $20 in one academy (Illinois), $25 in two (Michigan and Nebraska) and $50 in one (Virginia) entitles a person to life membership. The payment of $100 in four academies (Indiana, Nebraska, North Carolina and Ohio) entitles a person to the standing of patron; the Virginia Academy, however, requires $1,000 for this form of membership. Qualifications for membership may be covered generally by the statement that in fourteen of the academies any one "interested in science," "interested in the progress of science," or "interested in scientific work," to quote from the constitutions, may become an active member. The New Hampshire Academy is the only one that attaches an age limit (twenty-five years). Unless the committees on membership scrutinize applications very carefully, it seems to be rather easy to get into most of the academies. A few have more definite requirements; e.g., Georgia requires five years of recognized scientific work or five years of productive work in a college faculty, or some noteworthy contribution to science; Illinois demands interest in science in the state and in the nation; for Indiana the candidate must be engaged in original research or some other phase of scientific work; New Hampshire wants proficiency in some branch of recognized science; North Carolina wants active interest in the promotion of science, while for

Oklahoma, Pennsylvania and Tennessee the candidate should preferably be engaged in scientific work. Maryland again stands out in requiring, in addition to an interest in science, a desire for self-improvement and a desire to help others; this may be related to the fact that the Maryland Academy is "principally a popular academy in which any intelligent person of good character may participate." Curiously, two academies (New Orleans and Wisconsin) report that no qualifications are required for active membership. On the whole, qualifications seem to be framed broadly enough so that acquaintance with scientific workers in other fields than one's own may be obtained in a social and appreciative way without too much detailed machinery of enrolling. The experience of some academies in regard to membership qualification may well be useful to other academies and it might be very valuable if these qualifications might receive special attention from the Committee on Academy Relations, recently established by the American Association (SCIENCE for May 20, 1927, page 508, paragraph 14).

Annual dues are very moderate in all these academies, one dollar in eight academies and two dollars in four. Four academies require an initiation fee of one dollar, four require a two-dollar fee, and one a three-dollar fee. Annual dues of one or two dollars seem much more desirable than higher dues. Academy publications might better be financed in other ways than by means of annual dues, as will appear later in this paper.

In order to evaluate the objects or purposes of the state academies, each secretary was asked if the main object of his academy was "(1) to promote scientific research among purely scientific investigators of your state, or (2) to increase the fellowship among persons having scientific interests though not necessarily engaged in research." Dr. A. M. Peter, secretary of the Kentucky Academy, sent this reply: "The constitution of the Kentucky Academy declares that the object of the academy is 'to encourage scientific research, to promote the diffusion of useful scientific knowledge, and to unify the scientific interests of the State.' I think, however, that most good comes from bringing together those who are interested in scien tific matters in the state, whether they are actually doing research work or not-that is, I think the most important duty of the academy is that described in your second item." This expresses very happily exactly what I think we all feel our own New Hampshire Academy stands for. It also expresses substantially what the majority of the secretaries express in varying ways. Two academies (Kansas and New Orleans) rate fostering research as more important than increasing fellowship; two others (Pennsylvania