Constitutionalism, Identity, Difference, and Legitimacy: Theoretical Perspectives
Interest in constitutionalism and in the relationship among constitutions, national identity, and ethnic, religious, and cultural diversity has soared since the collapse of socialist regimes in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. Since World War II there has also been a proliferation of new constitutions that differ in several essential respects from the American constitution. These two developments raise many important questions concerning the nature and scope of constitutionalism. The essays in this volume--written by an international group of prominent legal scholars, philosophers, political scientists, and social theorists--investigate the theoretical implications of recent constitutional developments and bring useful new perspectives to bear on some of the longest enduring questions confronting constitutionalism and constitutional theory.
Sharing a common focus on the interplay between constitutional identity and individual or group diversity, these essays offer challenging new insights on subjects ranging from universal constitutional norms and whether constitutional norms can be successfully transplanted between cultures to a consideration of whether constitutionalism affords the means to reconcile a diverse society's quest for identity with its need to properly account for its differences; from the relation between constitution-making and revolution to that between collective interests and constitutional liberty and equality.
This collection's broad scope and nontechnical style will engage scholars from the fields of political theory, social theory, international studies, and law.
Contributors. Andrew Arato, Aharon Barak, Jon Elster, George P. Fletcher, Louis Henkin, Arthur J. Jacobson, Carlos Santiago Nino, Ulrich K. Preuss, David A. J. Richards, Michel Rosenfeld, Dominique Rousseau, András Sajó, Frederick Schauer, Bernhard Schlink, M. M. Slaughter, Cass R. Sunstein, Ruti G. Teitel, Robin West
Results 1-3 of 85
ls In the end , the arguments against the bill of rights carried the day . At the
Assemblée Constituante , voices were raised against adopting a bill of rights
before the constitution was wholly written . However , the Assembly ' s motive was
fear of ...
Although there were voices at the Federal Convention arguing for the adoption of
a temporary or incomplete constitution which could be improved later , the two
most influential framers firmly rebutted this idea . Madison argued that reforming ...
Bingham certainly believed and argued that , as a matter of political theory , no
state had the authority to violate inalienable human rights like those guaranteed
by the First Amendment . In contrast to Wilson , he thought the Constitution ...
What people are saying - Write a review
Toward a First Amendment Jurisprudence
CONSTITUTIONALISM AS BRIDGE BETWEEN SELF
13 other sections not shown