The Semantics of ScienceA&C Black, 2005 M04 15 - 240 pages The Semantics of Science proposes a radical new rethinking of science and scientific discourse. Roy Harris argues that supercategories such as science, art, religion and history are themselves verbal constructs, and thus language-dependent. Because each supercategory is constructed differently, it is necessary to pay attention to the linguistic process by which a discourse such as 'science' has developed. Through this view it is possible to observe that the function of the supercategory is to integrate what would otherwise be separate activities and enquiries, and the result of this integration is therefore a re-drawing of the intellectual world that society as a whole adopts. In the course of his study of The Semantics of Science Roy Harris looks at the history and development of scientific discourse to show through language that what is meant by science has changed since it was first theorised by the Greeks. Harris traces the semantic development of 'science' through the years of the Royal Society to the present day, moving on to an analysis of rhetoric, mathematics, common sense and finally the supercategory of semantics. This lucidly written yet radical new theory on the language of science will be fascinating reading for academics and students researching semantics, semiotics or applied linguistics. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 37
Page 7
... observations. In support of this, McKeon cites what Aristotle says about Democritus in Parts of Animals 642a24–31. On ... observation. Neither Aristotle, nor Democritus, nor any of their predecessors proposed a 'scientific method' for ...
... observations. In support of this, McKeon cites what Aristotle says about Democritus in Parts of Animals 642a24–31. On ... observation. Neither Aristotle, nor Democritus, nor any of their predecessors proposed a 'scientific method' for ...
Page 10
... observing it to be that colour , nor that water is wet ( a commonsense proposition if ever there was one ) from our many experiences of immersion . However strong our impres- sions may be that these things are so , they do not , as such ...
... observing it to be that colour , nor that water is wet ( a commonsense proposition if ever there was one ) from our many experiences of immersion . However strong our impres- sions may be that these things are so , they do not , as such ...
Page 11
... observation nor experiment , however meticulously conducted and repeated , will suffice in themselves . The Aristotelian scientist also requires an appropriate terminology , in which the results of observation and experiment can ...
... observation nor experiment , however meticulously conducted and repeated , will suffice in themselves . The Aristotelian scientist also requires an appropriate terminology , in which the results of observation and experiment can ...
Page 14
... observation and experiment , affix the right verbal labels to the right items . Getting it right is the foundation of good science . This is the reocentric ideal . * * * According to Cassirer, the Aristotelian view both of logic and 14 ...
... observation and experiment , affix the right verbal labels to the right items . Getting it right is the foundation of good science . This is the reocentric ideal . * * * According to Cassirer, the Aristotelian view both of logic and 14 ...
Page 23
... observations to general principles and back to observations' (Losee 1980: 6), this two-way process involving an ... observation of hitherto unnamed creatures (say dogs) a generalization is reached about their common characteristics ...
... observations to general principles and back to observations' (Losee 1980: 6), this two-way process involving an ... observation of hitherto unnamed creatures (say dogs) a generalization is reached about their common characteristics ...
Contents
1 | |
5 | |
25 | |
3 Semantics and the Royal Society | 47 |
4 Science in the kitchen | 64 |
5 The rhetoric of linguistic science | 83 |
6 Mathematics and the language of science | 106 |
7 Science and common sense | 129 |
8 Supercategory semantics | 152 |
9 Integrating science | 176 |
Appendix 1 Einstein on science and reality | 189 |
Appendix 2 Heisenberg on language | 202 |
References | 209 |
Index | 215 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
according already Aristotelian Aristotle Aristotle's assumptions basis Betty Bloomfield Bohr Boyle’s law Bridgman called Carnap claim classical physics communication concept copper correspondence counting defined Demiurge described discourse distinction Einstein everyday example existing experience explain fact fixed code fixed-code geography Greek Harré Heisenberg Heisenberg 1989 Holt-Jensen human idea inquiry integration integrationist kind knowledge Kuhn language of science language user linguistic logic material objects mathematics means measurement Medawar metaphysical modern names Nature Neogrammarian notion number-words observation ordinary language paradigm particular philosophy of language philosophy of science physics possible pre-scientific principles problem proposed psychocentric question reference relativity of simultaneity reocentric reocentric semantics rhetoric rhetoric of science Saussure scientific method scientists seems semantics of science sense signs simultaneity space spagyrists Sprat statement supercategory suppose symbols syntax Thales theory things tion trajectory truth understand verbal Vienna Circle Wilkins words