Page images
PDF
EPUB

made a connecting link with the cartilaginous fishes, among which Gmelin, differing from Linnæus, had before actually placed it. The two original species of Linnæus are increased to nine. They are all inhabitants of the Nile.

The cartilaginous fishes have been arranged by Dr. Shaw in a single order, without regard to the division into chondroptingious and branchiostegous, suggested first by Artedius, adopted by Linnæus in the earlier editions of the Systema Nature, but afterwards discarded, and at length restored by Gmelin and most other foreign ichthyologists. It has been much improved, and more clearly explained, by Cepede; but as it still stands in need of elucidation with respect to some genera, it should not perhaps for the present be admitted into a systematic arrangement.

All the Linnean genera are retained, with the addition of gastrobranchus, spatularia, and cephalus: but the gastrobranchus is only the myxine glutinosa of Linnæus, raised to a higher rank in the system. The history of this transplanted genus will be new to many of

our readers.

"The fish which constitutes this genus has long since been described by Linnæus and others, under the title of myxine glutinosa, and considered as belonging to the tribe of vermes, in which situation it ranks in the latest editions of the Systema Naturæ. Dr. Bloch, however, from accurate examination both of its external and internal structure, has very justly considered it as a legitimate cartilaginous fish. The usual length of the European specimens is from four to six inches, but in the Indian Ocean it appears to arrive at a far superior size, nearly equalling in this respect the common cel. In its general appearance it bears a near resemblance to the lampreys, with which by Kalm, its first describer, it has been associated. It is remarkable for the total want of eves, not the least vestige of any such organs being discoverable by the most attentive examination: the mouth, which is situated beneath, as in the lampreys, is of an oblong form; on each side are two beards, or cirrhi, and on the upper part four: in front of the top of the head is a small spout hole, furnished with a valve, by which it can at pleasure be closed; the teeth, which are situated very deep in the mouth and are of an orange colour, as in the lamprey, are disposed on each side into a double row, in form of a pectinated bone; each upper row consisting of nine, and each lower row of eight teeth, and in the middle of the roof of the mouth is a single, sharppointed, and curved tooth; no nostrils are discoverable; the body is destitute of scales,

lateral line, and every kind of fin, except tha which forms the tail; this fin is shallow, and commencing at the lower part of the back, runs round the extremity of the body, the extremity of the body, where it is sur and is continued beneath as far as the vent; rounded by the caudal fin, is taper or pointed: beneath the body, from head to tail, runs a double row of pretty conspicuous pores, through which, on pressure, exudes a viscid fluid, and at somewhat more than a third of the animal from the head, are situ ated, beneath the body, the two spiracula, which consist of a pair of oval apertures. of these apertures communicate with a series On laying open the fish, it appears that each of globular red cells, or vesicles, disposed to the number of six on each side the body; every one of these twelve cells, or vesicles, communicates on its exterior side with another duct leading into the mouth; below these cells is situated the heart, which is of a roundish or but slightly cordate shape: the divisions, of which the upper is smallest; liver is large, and consists of two lobes, or the ovarium is of a lengthened form, and the ova appear to arrive at a very considerable size before they are excluded from the body, and it is doubtful whether they may not hatch internally, as in some other fishes, before exclusion. The general colour of the animal is whitish, with a dusky blueish cast abore, and reddish towards the head and tail; the fin surrounding the tail part is yellowish brown.

"The manners of this fish are represented as highly singular: it is said to enter the b dies of such fishes as it happens to find es the fishermen's hooks, and which cons quently have not the power of escaping is attacks, and by gnawing its way through the skin, to devour all the internal parts, leavi only the bones and the skin remaining. An other particularity in this animal consists in its uncommonly glutinous nature: if p into a large vessel of sea-water, it is said in a very short space to render the whole so gl tinous, as easily to be drawn out in the form of threads; when taken out of water, the gastrobranchus is said to be incapable of be ing more than three or four hours. It is an inhabitant of the northern scas, and appears also to occur in those of the southern heme sphere, where it arrives at a much larger size. This idea is grounded on a drawing by Dr. Forster, in the collection of sir Joseph Banks, which appears to represent a gigante specimen of the gastrobranchus cæcus. the British Museum is also a specimen of equal size, but not in such a state as to admit of very accurate examination. Perhap it

la

may rather belong to a species, observed by Dombey in the South American seas, and de scribed by Cepede from the dried skin in the Paris museum. The head of this new species differs from that of the cæcus, in bein rounded and broader than the body. On the upper lip are four beards; the number on the

lower uncertain, from the imperfection of the specimen; teeth pointed, compressed, triangular, and disposed in two circular ranges, the exterior of which is composed of twentytwo, and the interior of fourteen teeth; a single tooth, longer than the rest, and of a curved form, in the roof of the mouth, as in the European species: eyes and nostrils imperceptible: tail rounded at the extremity, and terminated by a very shallow fin united with the anal."

The new generic name well expresses the peculiar situation of the spiracles, but we question whether any advantage is gained by it, equivalent to the confusion unavoidably occasioned by a change of the ancient appellation. A gainst the new trivial name we must strongly protest. When the species stood alone, none was necessary. When a genus has only a single species, that species is sufficiently designated by the generic name, with the peculiar advantage of conciseness. In the present case the appellation cacus is descriptive, but it does not discriminate, and if it had not been already given, it certainly would not now be adopted. The same objection may possibly lie against the Linnæan glatinosa, but the impropriety has not yet been proved.

The grotesque genus raja, subdivided by Linnæus according to its teeth, as they are either sharp or blunt, is thrown by our author into four sections, founded on the general form of the several speries, as they are either rhomboid, slender tailed, rounded, or lengthened. Its striking peculiarities are well described.

"This genus is distinguished by the remarkable breadth and thinness of the body, the pectoral fins appearing like a continuation of the sides themselves, being covered with the common skin; their rays are cartilaginous, straight, and furnished with numerous swellings, or knots; the teeth are very numerous, small, and placed in ranges over the lips or edges of the mouth; the eyes are furmished with a nictitating membrane, or skin, which can at pleasure be drawn over them like an eyelid, and at some distance above the eyes are situated the nostrils, each appearing like a large and somewhat semilunar opening, edged with a reticulated skin, and furnished internally with a great many laminated processes, divided by a middle partition; they are guarded by an exterior valve: behind the eyes are also a pair of holes, communicating with the mouth and gills; these latter, taken together, present a vast extent of surface: the young are contained in oblong square capsules, with lengthened corners, and are discharged at distant intervals, the young

[ocr errors]

animal gradually liberating itself from its confinement, and adhering for some time by the umbilical vessels. The rays in general feed on the smaller kind of crabs, testacea, marine insects and fishes; they are constant inhabitants of the sea, lying concealed during part of the winter among the mud or sand, from which they occasionally emerge, and swim to unlimited distances."

In the genus squalus Dr. Shaw has not adopted the division of the sawfish, the pristis of Linnæus and the ancients, into four distinct species, as suggested by Mr. Latham; and though he men tions the paper of that gentleman in the Linnæan Transactions, he has taken no notice of his proposal to separate them from the squali, and form them into a distinct genus, augmented by the cirratus, a new species from New Holland. He thinks, however, as Klein had done before him, that the long snouted sharks are considerably allied to the long bodied rays, and may be said in some degree to connect the two genera. In conformity with this idea, they should have been placed immediately after raja, at the head, and not at the end, of their own genus. In the account of the Beaumaris shark a supposed error of Mr. Pennant is corrected." In the British Zoology," says Dr. Shaw," the upper lobe of the tail is said to be ten, and the lower thirteen, inches long; but it is clear from the plate, engraved from Mr. Davies's drawing, that this is an error." We know not how the calculation has been made out, but the error is certainly not Mr. Pennant's, who says clearly that the upper horn, or lobe, of the tail in Mr. Davies's specimen was one foot ten inches, and the lower one foot one, sufficiently corresponding with the representation in the figure.

The new genus spatulana, polyodon of Cepede, is allied to the sharks, especially those of the sawfish tribe, but is decisively distinguished from them by having a single spiracle on each side of the neck, with a large operculum or The generic name is taken from cover, its long spatule-shaped snout. given it by Cepede would have done equally well for squalus. It consists of one species, of which the particular history, and even the usual residence, are unknown. which

That

Cepede has also a new genus, he calls aodon, containing three species, two observed in the Red Sea by Forskal, and the other described by Brunich. In

[blocks in formation]

The new genus cephalus has been instituted by Dr. Shaw, at the expence of the genera tetrodon and diodon, for those species in which the body terminates so abruptly as to resemble only the head of a fish. He formed it to avoid the confusion occasioned by a mistake of Linnæus concerning the true genus of the short sunfish, his tetrodon mola, which, according to his own principles of arrangement, ought to have been a diodon. It would have been easy to change its place; but another species of diodon has been introduced by Gmelin, with the same trivial name; "so that the restoring the short sunfish, even under a different title, would but have increased the confusion." We cannot think a difficulty of this kind a sufficient reason for the appointment of a new ge

[ocr errors]

But in the present case à much better might have been alleged. All the four species differ so essentially from diodon and tetrodon in the union of the dorsal, caudal, and anal fins, in the truncated form of their bodies, and their inability to inflate themselves at pleasure, that there can be no doubt of their right to constitute a separate genus. Cepede has suffered the short sunfish to retain its original place in the genus tetrodon, and, as usual with the French naturalists, has attributed the diodon mola of Gmelin to Linnæus.

To the genus syngnathus a very singular species is added, of which the following account is given.

"Foliated Pipe-fish. "Syngnathus foliatus. S, olivacea-nigricans, albido-punctatus, appendicibus foliaceis. "Blackish-olive pipefish, with white specks,

and leaf-shaped appendages.

"A most extraordinary species, far exceed ing all the rest of the genus in the singularity of its appearance, which is such as at first view rather to suggest the idea of some pro duction of fancy than of any real existence, In its general shape it is greatly allied to the sea-horse pipe-fish, but is considerably longer in proportion, or of a more slender habit: its greatest particularity however consists in the large leaf-shaped appendages, with which the back, tail, and abdomen are fur

nished; these appendages are situated on very strong, rough, square spines or processes, and, were it not for the perfect regularity of their respective proportions, might be misadhering to the spines. The colour of the taken for the leaves of some kind of fucus whole animal is a dusky or blackish olive, ly sprinkled on all parts, except on the appen(perhaps greener in the living subject), thick. dages, with small round whitish specks, and accompanied by a kind of metallic gloss on the abdomen: the fins are soft, tender, and transparent. This curious species is a native which the description was drawn, and of of the Indian seas. The specimen from which a representation is given in the work,

was taken on the coast of New Holland. Nothing particular is known relative to its habits, or natural history."

Most of the other genera are consider. ably enlarged by the accession of new species from Bloch, Cepede, and others, which are described in our author's usual perspicuous and elegant manner: but they do not afford matter for animadver sion, and it would be useless to give a mere catalogue of their names. We therefore take leave of Dr. Shaw for the present year, sincerely wishing him health and spirits to go through the remainder of the work. We observe with pleasure that as he proceeds, he not only feels more the strength of his own powers, but has almost entirely avoided the little inaccuracies of style which we occasionally remarked in the former volumes. But we are fearful that his general readers will think this part of it contains more of science than of entertainment. This was in a great degree unavoidable from the nature of the subject. Ichthy ology, in most cases, admits only of dry description: for nothing more is known. We wait with impatience for the time when we shall have the gratification t accompany him into the fertile field of entomology, where wonders abound on every side, which cannot fail to fix the attention of the curious, which will li ligent inquirer, and which can never be berally repay the labours of the most di of the most skilful naturalist. The aniexhausted by the unwearied researches mals, indeed, are minute, and cannot without the aid of magnifying powers i always be accurately described or seen but many of them are completely within our reach, and give us a full opportunity of observing their general economy, and of tracing their progress through the various stages of their being.

ART. 11. History of British Birds. The Figures engraved on Wood, by P. BEWICK. In Two Volumes. 8vo.

THE publication of the general history of quadrupeds in the year 1790, with figures engraved on wood by Mr. Bewick, forms a new æra in the history of the elegant arts. This kind of engraving was nearly coeval with that on copper; and, for some time after it was invented, was practised by several of the most eminent painters as an easy and expeditious method of multiplying copies of their works. Most of the earlier writers of natural history also employed similar figures of plants and animals. Some of these did honour to the artist: but the greatest part of them were rude and in expressive, and could boast of no kind of merit. The superior beauty and splendour of copper-plate engravings gradually obtained a decided preference, and, during the greater part of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, wooden cuts were of little use but to embellish halfpenny ballads and school-books for little children.

It was reserved for Mr. Bewick to revive and restore to its original dignity, a nearly forgotten art. Educated for the profession of an engraver, but endowed with a painter's eye, he could not confine his attention to the mechanical operations of his regular business; and though placed by the accident of birth in a provincial town, at a great distance from the capital and from extensive patronage, his native genius burst through every impediment and pointed out to him the way to celebrity and honour. His particular turn of mind led him to observe and to delineate the form and manners of the animal creation; and he soon found that the yielding consistence of wood is better fitted to express the ease, freedom, and spirit which ought to characterize portraits of animated beings than the stubborn surface of a metallic substance. He accordingly engraved wooden blocks of all the domestic and most of the wild British quadrupeds, and neglected no opportunity of drawing such foreign animals as were exhibited in the itinerant collections which visited Newcastle-upon-Tyne. These universally shew the hand of a master. There is in them a boldness of design, a correctness of outline, an exactness of attitude, and a discrimination of generd character, conveying at the

first glance a just and lively idea of each different animal, to which nothing in modern times has ever aspired, and which the most eminent old artists have not surpassed. But Mr. Bewick's merits as an artist extend far beyond the simple delineation of the animal. The landscapes which he sometimes introduces as a back ground and relief to his principal figures, as well as the greater part of his numerous vignettes, have a similar excellence; and though the parts of which they consist are extremely minute, there is in them a truth and nature which admits of the strictest examination, and will be admired in proportion as they are more attentively observed and better understood. Many of them are adapted to the work, and exhibit several of our domestic animals in various situations and modes of action.

Mr. Bewick had no just reason to be apprehensive for his reputation as an artist; but he distrusted his talents as a writer. He therefore applied to a friend, brought up like himself to one of the more elegant manual arts, and possessing a taste congenial with his own. The descriptions which it was desirable, if not absolutely necessary, should accompany the figures, were drawn up by Mr. Beilby, chiefly from the works of Buffon and Pennant, but with the addition of so much original matter as clearly demonstrates, that the author has been accustomed to survey the objects around him with the ardour and penetration of a real naturalist. Urged to the study of nature by the impulse of native genius, he has readily seized those prominent features which group the distinct species of quadrupeds into large families, without tying himself down to any of the methods prescribed by systematic writers; and has produced, beyond all comparison, the best book which has hitherto been published in the English language for the use of young persons of both sexes in an early period of their education.

The work, when completed, was published at the joint risk of the engraver, the writer and the printer. And its success was such as from its various merits might well be expected. A second cdition with improvements soon appeared, and a third was afterwards demanded. The authors, having thus abundant rea

son to be satisfied with the fruits of their labours, were encouraged to proceed to another undertaking. In 1797 the first volume of the work more directly before us was published. The former was a general history comprehending all the known quadrupeds in every part of the world: but as Bewick's talents are best displayed when they are employed on living subjects, he judiciously confined himself to British birds, and as far as living ones are actually before him, his figures have all the spirit and characteristic expression which distinguish his former performances. This publication is also a partnership production. "While one of the editors was engaged in preparing the engravings, the compilation of the descriptions was undertaken by the other, subject, however, to the corrections of his friend, whose habits had led him to a more intimate acquaintance with this branch of natural history." The language and general composition are, therefore, avowedly Mr. Beilby's, and he modestly deprecates the "seve rity of criticism on the production of hours which could be spared from a laborious employment." But such a plea is by no means necessary. The general history of quadrupeds did him credit; and the history of British birds is in our opinion a much better composition. It has also more of a scientific form, and is drawn up with a stricter regard to the arrangement of other writers. In the interval that had passed since the first publication it is probable that both the editors had applied more seriously to the study of natural history as a regular science; and in particular had profited by the masterly works of Pennant and Latham. But they have too much genius to suffer themselves to be led in trammels, and not to follow the direction of their own judgment with respect to natural affinities.

The first volume contains the great division of land birds. In conformity with Linnæus, and in opposition to Pennant, the shrikes, on account of their natural propensities and modes of life, are placed in the rear of those birds which subsist by rapine and plunder; though in the opinion of our authors "they bear no small resemblance to the harmless and inoffensive tribes of the passerine

kind."

The pies of Linnæus constitute a very irregular trile, widely differing from each other in every respect except the

structure of their bill; and even in that the correspondence is founded on a cha racter which has little or no influence on the general habits of the animals. We have, therefore, long wished to see it skilfully divided into two, so as to sepa rate the parrot and the raven, from the bee-eater and humming bird, and todraw a well marked line between those genera in each section, which most nearly ap proximate to each other. As the heterogeneous nature of the birds in this order is less remarkable in the British than in some of the foreign species, nothing has been taken from it but the kingfisher, which," as it lives entirely on fish, and is constantly found on the margin of still waters, may with greater propriety be denominated a water bird than many which come under that description." But in return an addition is made of the chatterer, the stare, the thrush, and the other British species of turdus, as more nearly allied to it than the birds of the passerine order. On what consideration this opinion is founded, unless it be their superior size, we cannot determine: but even if we set aside the configuration of their bills, most of them appear to stand, with at least as much propriety, where modern naturalists have usually placed them, at the bead of the singing birds. The water ouzel, turnus cinclus of Linnæus, is removed to the water birds.

Our authors consider the snow flake, emberiza nivalis of Linnæus, and the tawny bunting, montana of Albin, as the same bird in its winter and summer dress, and suppose that the mountain brambling of Pennant, the lesser moun tain finch or brambling of Willoughby, is also the same bird, in a somewhat di ferent dress. Linnæus in the Fauna Suecica had made the second a variety of the first, with some hesitation whether i may not be a distinct species, acknowledging however that Leche had deter mined them to be the same; and to this decision he appears afterward to have fully acceded, for in the 12th edition of the Syst. Nat. the variety is omitted. Mr. Pennant in his British Zoology, vol. I. no. 121, 122, has separated them with out assigning a reason, or noticing the different opinion of Linnæus, and has added the lesser mountain finch of Willoughby as a third distinct species. Mr. Latham has adopted the same opinion, and has added the following note: "Linnæus has comprized the whole of the foregoing (the snow bunting, the

« PreviousContinue »