Kierkegaard and Socrates: A Study in Philosophy and Faith

Front Cover
Cambridge University Press, 2006 M04 24
This volume is a study of the relationship between philosophy and faith in Søren Kierkegaard's Philosophical Fragments. It is also the first book to examine the role of Socrates in this body of writings, illuminating the significance of Socrates for Kierkegaard's thought. Jacob Howland argues that in the Fragments, philosophy and faith are closely related passions. A careful examination of the role of Socrates demonstrates that Socratic, philosophical eros opens up a path to faith. At the same time, the work of faith - which holds the self together with that which transcends it - is essentially erotic in the Socratic sense of the term. Chapters on Kierkegaard's Johannes Climacus and on Plato's Apology shed light on the Socratic character of the pseudonymous author of the Fragments and the role of 'the god' in Socrates' pursuit of wisdom. Howland also analyzes the Concluding Unscientific Postscript and Kierkegaard's reflections on Socrates and Christ.

From inside the book

Contents

Section 1
28
Section 2
57
Section 3
79
Section 4
102
Section 5
129
Section 6
137
Section 7
157
Section 8
173
Section 9
188

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 207 - The only Thought which Philosophy brings with it to the contemplation of history, is the simple conception of Reason...
Page 207 - ... the final cause of the World at large, we allege to be the consciousness of its own freedom on the part of Spirit, and ipso facto, the reality of that freedom. But that this term
Page 105 - Presumably it could occur to a human being to poetize himself in the likeness of the god or the god in the likeness of himself, but not to poetize that the god poetized himself in the likeness of a human being,48 for if the god gave no indication, how could it occur to a man that the blessed god could need him?
Page 29 - You shall no longer be called Jacob, but Israel, for you have striven with God and with humans, and have prevailed.
Page 119 - However, one should not think slightingly of the paradoxical; for the paradox is the source of the thinker's passion, and the thinker without a paradox is like a lover without feeling : a paltry mediocrity. But the highest pitch of every passion is always to will its own downfall...

About the author (2006)

Jacob Howland is McFarlin Professor of Philosophy at the University of Tulsa. He is the author of The Republic: The Odyssey of Philosophy and The Paradox of Political Philosophy: Socrates' Philosophic Trial and has contributed to Metaphysics, Phoenix, the American Political Science Review, and the Review of Politics, among other journals.

Bibliographic information