Page images
PDF
EPUB

keys, as it has been called, was by our Saviour conferred not upon a particular order of difciples, but upon the church, See Matt. xviii. 15, 16, 17, 18. It is not faid, if he shall neglect to hear the one or two, tell it to the elders of the church; far lefs can it be meant that the offended perfon fhould tell the cause of his offence to all the difciples in a prefbytery or diocese confifting of many congregations: but he is required to tell it to that particular church or congregation to which they both belong; and the fentence of that affembly, pronounced by its elders, is in a very folemn manner declared to be final, from which there lies no appeal to any jurifdiction on earth. With refpect to the conftituting of elders in any church or congregation, the Independent reafons as follows: The officers of Chrift's appointment are either ordinary and permanent in the church, or they were extraordinary and peculiar to the planting of Chriftianity. The extraordinary were employed in laying the plan of the gofpel churches, and in publishing the New Teftament revelation. Such were the apoftles, the chofen witnesses of our Saviour's refurrection; fuch were the prophets infpired by the Holy Ghoft for explaining infallibly the Old Teftament by the things written in the New; and fuch were the evangelifts, the apostles minifters. Thefe can be fucceeded by none in that which was peculiar to them, becaufe their work was completed by themselves. But they are fucceeded in all that was not peculiar to them by elders and deacons, the only two ordinary and permanent orders of minifters in the church, We have already feen, that it belongs to the office of the elder to feed the flock of Chrift; and the only queftion to be fettled is, how men are ordinarily called to that office? for about the office of the deacon there is little or no difpute. No man now can pretend to be fo call. ed of God to the miniftry of the word as the apoftles and other inspired elders were, whom he chofe to be the publifhers of his revealed truth, and to whofe miffion he bore, witness in an extraordinary manner. But what the apoftles were to thofe who had the divine oracles from their mouths, that their writings are to us: and there fore, as no man can lawfully pretend a call from God to make any addition to thofe writings, fo neither can any man pretend to be lawfully called to the miniftry of the word already written, but in the manner which that word directs. Now there is nothing of which the New Teftament fpeaks more clearly, than of the characters of those who should exercise the office of elders in the church, and of the actual exercise of that office. The former are graphically drawn in the epiftles to Timothy and Titus; and the latter is minutely defcribed in Paul's difcourfe to the Ephefian elders, in Peter's exhortation to elders, and our Lord's commiflion to thofe minifters, with whom he promifed to be always prefent even unto the end of the world. It is not competent for any man or body of men to add to, or diminish from the defcription of a gofpel minifter given in thefe places, fo as to infift upon the neceffity of any qualification which is not there mentioned, or to difpenfe with any qualification as needlefs which is there required. Neither has Jefus Chrift, the

only legislator to the church, given to any mini fters or people any power or right whatsoever to call, fend, elect, or ordain, to that office, any perfon who is not qualified according to the de fcription given in his law; nor has he given an power or right to reject the leaft of them who ar fo qualified, and who defire the office of a bifhop or elder. Let a man have hands laid upon him by fuch as could prove an uninterrupted defcen by impofition of hands from the apostles; let hin be fet apart to that office by a company of mini ters themselves, the moft conformable to th fcripture character, and let him be chosen by th moft holy people on earth; yet if he aufwer no the New Teftament defcription of a minifter, h is not called of God to that office, and is no mi nifter of Chrift, but is indeed running unfent. No form of ordination can pretend to fuch a clea foundation in the New Teftament as the defcrip tion of the perfons who fhould be elders of the church; and the laying on of hands, whether by bishops or prefbyters, is of no more importanc in the million of a minifter of Chrift, than the waving of one's hand in the air, or the putting o it into his bofom; for now when the power o miracles has ceafed, it is obvious that fuch a rite by whomsoever performed, can convey no powers whether ordinary or extraordinary. Indeed i appears to have been fometimes ufed even in the apoftolic age without any fuch intention. (Se Acts xiii. 3.) In a word, whoever in his life and converfation is conformable to the character which the infpired writers give of a bishop or el der, and is likewife qualified by his " mightines in the fcripture" to discharge the duties of that office, is fully authorised to adminifter the facra ments of baptifm and the Lord's fupper, to teach exhort, and rebuke, with all long suffering and doc trine, and has all the call and miffion which the Lord now gives to any man; whilft he who wants the qualifications mentioned, has not God's call whatever he may have; nor any authority to preach the gofpel of Chrift, or to difpenfe the or dinances of his religion. From this view of the Independent principles, which is faithfully taken from their own writers, it appears, that, accord ing to them, even the election of a congregation confers upon the man whom they may choof for their paftor no new powers, but only a new relation between him and a particular flock, ving him an exclufive right, either by himself in conjunction with other paftors conftituted the fame manner, to exercife among them tha authority which he derives immediately from Chrift, and which, in a greater or lefs degree, poffeffed by every fincere Christian, according t his gifts and abilities.

"

(8.) INDEPENDENTS, SCOTS. There are tw fects of Independents in Scotland: the first whom have no peculiar denomination befides the general one of Independents or Congregationalis Their religious fentiments are ftrictly Calviniftic and agree in general with thofe of the English In dependents. (See § 4-) The other fect is gene rally denominated in Scotland GLASSITES, from their founder Mr John Glafs; (See GLASS, N and in England SANDEMANIANS, from Mr Robe Sandeman, who fpread their doctrines in Eng

lan

n.

land and America. Some subdivisions have late- or stated direction.- By contingents I understand ly taken place among them. For their definition all things which may be done, and may not be of faith, and other peculiar opinions and practice, done, may happen, or may not happen, by reason see SANDEMANIANS. Both these feats agree in of the indetermination or accidental occurrence of the general principles above set forth, (§ 6 and 7.) the causes. Bramhall againj Hobbes, with regard to creeds and church government. * INDETERMINED. adj. (in and determined.]

INDEPENDENTISM, n. S. the do&trine of the Unsettled ; unfixed. - We should not amuse ourINDEPENDENTS. See that article, $ 4-8. felves with floating words of indetermined fignifi

* INDEPENDENTLY. adv. (from independ- cation, which we can use in several senses to serve ent.] Without reference to other things. Dispose a turn. Locke. lights and shadows, without finishing every thing INDEVILLARS, a town of France, in the dep. independently the one of the other. Dryden of Doubs ; 6 miles SE. of Blamont.

INDERSEE, a town of Germany, in Austria, * INDEVOTION. n. . [indevotion, French; 3 miles SW. of Tauffkirchen.

in and devotion.] Want of devotion; irreligious. INDERTAUPLITZ, a river in Stiria. Let us make the church the scene of our peniINDERVAU, an island in the Persian Gulf. tence, as of our faults; deprecate our former in

* INDESERT. n.l. [in and defert.) Want of devotion, and, by an exemplary reverence, redress merit. This is an useful word, but not much re- the scandal of profaneness. Decay of Piety. ceived.--Those who were once looked on as his * INDEVOUT. adj. [indevot, French ; in and equals, are apt to think the fame of his merit a re- devout.] Not devout; not religious; irreligion.fe&tion on their own indeferts. Addison,

He prays much, yet curses more; whilft he is * INDESINENTLY. adv. (indefinenter, Fr. meek, yet indevout. Decay of Piety. in and defino, Latin.) Without cellation.—They * INDEX. n. S. (Latin.] 1. The discoverer ; continue a month indefinently. Ray.

the pointer out.-Taffes are the indexes of the difINDESTRUCTIBLE. adj. in and deftru&ti ferent qualities of plants, as well as of all sorts of ble.). Not to be destroyed.--Glass is so compact aliment. Arbuthnot.-That which was once the and firm a body, that it'is indestru&ible by art or index to point out all virtues, does now mark out nature. Boyle.

that part of the world where least of them resides, * INDETERMINABLE. adj. (in and deter- Decay of Piety. 2. The hand that points to any minable.] Not to be fixed; not to be defined or thing, as to the hour or way. They have no more settled. There is not only obscurity in the end, inward self-consciousness of what they do or sufbut beginning of the world; that, as its period is fer, than the index of a watch, of the hour it inscrutable, fo is its nativity indeterminable. Brown. points to. Bentley. 3. The table of contents to a

(1.)* INDETERMINATE.adj.lindeterminé,Fr. book. in and determinate.] Unfixed; not defined inde- In such indexes, although fmall finite.-The rays of the same colour were by turns To their fabsequent volumes, there is seen transmitted at one thickness, and reflected at ano- The baby figure of the giant mass ther thickness, for an indeterminate number of suc- Of things to come, at large.

Shak, ceffions. Newton.

- If a book has no index, or good table of con(2.) INDETERMINATE PROBLEM, OF UNLIMIT- tents, 'tis very useful to make one as you are readED PROBLEM, in algebra, that which admits of ing it; and in your index to take notice only of a great number of different answers, or of innu- parts new to you. Watts. merable different solutions. In such problems, the (2.) INDE$, in 'anatomy, the FORE FINGER, fo number of unknown quantities concerned is great- called from indico, I pointbecause that finger is er than the number of conditions or equations, by generally so used'; whence also the extensor indiwhich they are to be found; from which it hap- cis is called INDICATOR. pens, that generally some other conditions or (3.) Index, in arithmetic and algebra, shows to quantities are affumed to supply the defect, which, what power any quantity is involved, and is otherbeing taken at pleasure, give the same number of wise called its EXPONENT. anfwers as varieties in those assumptions. Dio- (4.) INDEX, EXPURGATORY, a catalogue of PHANTUS was the first writer on Indeterminate prohibited books in the church of Rome. The Problems, in his Algebra, first published in 1575 by first catalogues of this kind were made by the inXylander. His book being wholly on this subject, quifitors; and afterwards approved of by the such questions have been called DIOPHANTINE council of Trent, with some retrenchments and PROBLEMS.' Des Cartes, Fermat, Frenicle, Wal- additions. Thus an index of heretical books being lis, Euler, Grange, &c. have cultivated this branch formed, it was confirmed by a bull of Clement of algebra ; and Mr John Leslie, in the ad Vol. VIII. in 1595, and printed with several introducof the Edin. Philos. Trans. has given an ingenious tory rules ; by the 4th of which, the use of the paper on the solution of Indeterminate Problems, scriptures in the vulgar tongue is forbidden to all by a new and general principle.

persons without a particular licence; and by the * INDETERMINATELY. adv. (in and deter. Toth rule it is ordained, that no book shall be minately.) Indefinitely; not in any settled man- printed at Rome, without the approbation of the ner.-Flis perfpicacity difcerned the loadftone to Pope's vicar, or some person delegated by the respect the north,

when ours beheld it indetermi- Pope ; nor in any other places, unless allowed by nately. Brown.—The depth of the hold is indeter- the bisliop of the diocese, or some person deputed minately expreffed in the description. Arbuthnot. by him, or by the inquisitor of heretical pravity.

* INDETERMINATION. n. f. [in and deter- The Trent index being thus published, Philip 11. mination. Want of determination; want of fixed of Spain ordered another to be printed at Antwerp,

1

in 1471, with confiderable enlargements. Another was published in Spain in 1584; a copy of which was fnatched out of the fire when the English plundered Cadiz. Afterwards there were feveral expurgatory indexes printed at Rome and Naples, and particularly in Spain.

(5.) The INDEX OF A BOOK is that part annexed to a book, referring to the particular matters therein contained. Dr Johnfon is wrong ( 1, def. 3.) in reckoning an index fynonymous with a "table of contents." They are as different as the beginning and end of a book. The contents of a book are only intended to give a general and fum mary view of what is contained in it, in the order of its division into Parts, Chapters, or Sections; and as readers generally wish to know the subject or contents of a book before they perufe it, ought always to be prefixed to the work. The index, on the other hand, is intended to point out every important particular in a book, in its alphabetical order, that the reader may at once, and without difficulty, find out any article he wishes to be informed of, that is difcuffed or mentioned in the work; and as these are hardly completely known even to the author, till the work is finished, the index always appears with moft propriety fubjoined to the work. Every book of any extent ought to have both contents and index. Moft modern indexes to books are very carelessly compiled. About a century or two ago, very complete indexes were made to various learned works,by the editors of the claffics in ufum delphini, as well as by Minellius, Farnabius, Oudendorp, Ruddiman, and other literati. But now the compilation of an index, being thought too great a drudgery by many authors, is often entrusted to perfons very ill qualified for the tafk; in confequence of which modern indexes are feldom either complete or properly arranged. And if the work is extenfive, the reader is often perplexed with three or four different indexes, or an index divided into as many parts; while one complete general index, properly compiled and arranged, would anfwer the purpose much better. Thus that valuable and important work, Sir John Sinclair's Statifical Account of Scotland, has no fewer than three indexes, befides several alphabetical lifts, yet there is a vast mass of useful information contained in the 21 volumes of that excellent work, which the inquifitive reader will fearch for in vain through all thofe lifts and indexes; in the compilation of which elegance has evidently been preferred to utility.

(6.) INDEX OF A GLOBE, is a little ftyle fitted on to the N. pole, and turning round with it, pointing to certain divifions in the hour circle. It is fometimes alfo called gnomon. Sce GEO GRAPHY, and GNOMON,

* INDEXTERITY. n. f. [in and dexterity.] Want of dexterity; want of readinefs; want of handinefs; clumfinefs; awkwardness.-The indexterity of our confumption-curers demonftrates their dimnefs in beholding its caufes. Harvey on Conf. (1.) INDIA, an extensive region in Afia, which lies between 66° and 93° E. lon. and 7° and 33° N. lat. Under this name, the Europeans have erroneously understood all the countries which lie S. of Tartary, and extend from the eastern frontiers of Perfia to the eastern coasts of China, and

they have included likewife under the denomina tion of the E. Indies the islands of Japan, with all the islands in the Eastern and Indian Oceans, as far S. as New Holland. But the name of India can be applied, with propriety, to that country only which is diftinguished in Afia as well as in Europe by the name of Hindooftan. The countries to the E. of the river Burrampooter, viz. Aracan, Affam, Burmah, Cambodia, Cochin-China, Laos, Malac ca, Pegu, Siam, and Tonquin, which geographers have hitherto diftinguished by the name of the Peninsula beyond the Ganges, are no more to be confidered as belonging to India, than the bor dering countries of China, Thibet, Tartary, or Perfia. See HINDOOSTAN, 1—3, 9.

(2.) INDIA, ANCIENT ACCOUNTS OF. By the name of India the ancients underflood only the western peninfula, on this fide the Ganges, and the peninfula beyond it, having little or no knowledge of the countries which lie farther eastward. But though originally they were acquainted only with the western parts of Hindooftan, they gradually extended the name of India over the other countries they discovered to the eastward; fo that probably they would have involved all the reft in the fame general defignation, had they been as well acquainted with them as the moderns are. By whom thefe countries were originally peopled, is a question which in all probability will never be folved. Certain it is, that fome works in thefe parts difcover marks of aftonishing skill and power in the inhabitants, fuch as the images in the ifland of ELEPHANTA; the ROCKING STONES OF immense weight, yet fo nicely balanced that a man can move them with his hand; the OBSERVATORY at Benares, &c. (See ELEPHANTA, STONE, N° 15. and OBSERVATORY, N° 3. Thefe ftupendous works are by Mr Bryant attributed to the Cufhites or Babylonians, the first distinct nation in the world, and who of confequence must for fome time have poffeffed in a manner the fo vereignty of the whole earth; and it is probable, that the fubjects of Nimrod, the beginning of whofe kingdom was in Shinar, might extend themfelves eastward, and thus fill the fertile regions of the eaft with inhabitants, without thinking it worth while for a long time to meddle with the lefs mild and rich countries to the weft ward. Thus would be formed that great, and for fome time in fuperable, divifion betwixt the inhabitants of India and other countries; fo that the western nations knew not even of the existence of the Indians but by obfcure report; while the latter, ignorant their own origin, invented a thoufand idle tales concerning the antiquity of their nation, which fome of the moderns have been credulous enough to believe and record as facts. The firft among the western nations, who diftinguished themselve by their application to navigation and commerce and who were of confequence likely to difcover these diftant nations, were the Egyptians and Phe nicians. The former, however, foon loft their in clination for naval affairs, and held all fea-faring people in deteftation as profane perfons; thoug the extenfive conquefts of Sefoftris, if we can be lieve them, must have in a great measure fupplied this defect. He is faid to have fitted out a flee of 400 fail in the Arabian Gulph or Red Sea

which conquered all the countries lying along the according to Mr Bruce, was the present MOCHA; Erytbrean Sea to India; (See ERYTHRÆUM, No and Ophir the kingdom of Sofala, so remarkable 2.) while the army led by himself marched through in former times for its mines, that it was called Afia, and subdued all the countries to the Ganges; by Oriental writers the golden Sofala. See OPHIR, after which he crossed that river, and advanc- and TARSHISH. Thus the Indians continued long ed to the eastern ocean. Great disputes have unknown to the western nations, and undisturbed been carried on with respect to this conqueror, by them, probably in alliance with, or in subjection and his expedition; but Dr Robertson, in his Dif- to, the mighty empire of BABYLON, from which quistion concerning ancient India, doubts whether the country was originally peopled; and the possesany such expedition ever was made ;1. On account fion of this vast region will early account for the of the averfion the Egyptians entertained to seafa. immense, and otherwise almost incredible, wealth ring people, as well as the magnitude of the arma. and power of the ancient Babylonish monarchs. ments, which could not have been soon reared in Soon after the deftruction of ihat monarchy by any nation unaccustomed to maritime affairs. 2. the Persians, we find Darius Hyftaspes undertak. Because Herodotus makes no mention of the king an expedition against the Indians. Herodo. conquest of India by Sefoftris, though he relates tus informs us, that he sent Scylax of Caryandra his history at some length: and Diodorus Sicu. to explore the river Indus ; who failed from Caslus, who first mentions it, informs us that he had patyrus, a town at its source, and near the terri. it from the Egyptian prieks; who related “many tories of Pactya, eastward to the sea; and thence, things rather from a desire to promote the honour turning weft ward, arrived at the place where the of their country than from attention to truth.” Phænicians had formerly failed round Africa, after 3. On account of many improbabilities, or rather which Darius fubdued the Indians, and became impossibilities, contained in Diodorus's relations. master of that coast. His conquests, however, And, 4. because the judicious geographer Strabo were not extensive, as they did not reach beyond rejected the account altogether, and ranks the ex. the territory watered by the Indus; yet the acploits of Sefoftris in India with the fabulous ones quisition was very important, as the revenue deof Bacchus and Hercules.

rived from the conquered territory, according to (3.) INDIA, ANCIENT HISTORY OF, TO THE EX- Herodotus, was near a third of that of the whole PEDITION OF ALEXANDER THE GREAT. Whe. Persian empire. He tells us, that the empire was ther the Egyptians traded with India, or not, it divided into 20 satrapies or governments; which is certain that the Tyrians kept up a constant in. yielded a revenue of 14,560 Euboic talents, atercourse with some parts of India by navigating mounting in the whole to 2,807,4371. sterling. The the Arabian gulf, or the Red fea. Of this navigde amount of the revenue from the conquered provintion they became masters by taking from the Ida- ces of India therefore must have been considerably means some maritime places on the coast; but as sort of a million. But very little knowledge of the the diftance betwixt the nearest place of that sea country was acquired by this expedition of Darius: and Tyre was confiderable, the land carriage must for the Greeks paid no regard to the transactions have been very tedious and expensive ; for which of Barbitrians; and as for Scylax, he told so many reason it was necessary to become masters of a port incredible stories in the account he gave of his on the E. of the Mediterranean, nearer to the Red voyage, that he was disbelieved in almost every 1:a than Tyre. With this view they took poslef- thing, whether true or false. The Greeks acquifion of Rhinvelura, the nearest port on the Medi- red much more knowledge of India, by Alexander's terranean to the Arabian gulf; and to that port expedition, although he went no farther into the all the goods from India were conveyed by a much country than the territory now called PANJAB, all Thorter and less expensive route than over land. of which he did not traverse. Its SW. boundary

This is the first authentic account of anyintercourse is formed by a river anciently called the Hysudrus, betwixt India and the western part of the world: now the SETLEGE. The breadth of this district and to this we are without doubt in a great mca- from Ludhana on the Setlege, to Attock on the sure to ascribe the vast wealth and power for which Indus, is computed to be 239 geographical miles the city of Tyre was anciently renowned; for in in a straight line; and Alexander's march, comother respects the whole territory of Phænicia was puted in the same manner, did not exceed 200 ; but of little consequence. Notwithstanding the nevertheless, by the spreading of his numerous frequency of these voyages, however, the ancients army over the country, and the exact measurement have left little account of them. The most parti- and delineation of all his movements by men of cular description we have of the wealth, power, science whom he employed, a very extensive knowand commerce of ancient Tyre, is in the prophe- ledge of the western part of India was obtained. cies of Ezekiel. If the Tyrians kept any journals (4.) INDIA, HISTORY OF ALEXANDER'S EXPĘ. of their voyages, it is probable that they were DITION TO,, WITH ITS STATE AT. THAT PERIloft when the city was destroyed by Alexander the op. Of this celebrated conqueror's exploits preriGreat. Though the lsraelites, in the reigns of Da- ous to this expedition, an account will be found vid and Solomon, carried on an extensive and lu- under the article MACEDON. Having arrived at crative commerce, yet Dr Robertson is of opinion the Indus, which his army crossed by a bridge that they did not trade to any part of India. of boats, he refreshed his troops for a month on There are only two places mentioned to which the other side of that river, in the dominions of their lips failed, viz. Ophir and Tarshish; both his ally Taxiles; who gave him zo elephants, and of which are now supposed to have been situated from enmity to Porus, another famous Indian on the E. coast of Africa ; the ancient TARSHISH, prince of great courage and conduct, joined his VOL. XII. PART I.

L

army

a

2

army with 700 horfe and 5000 foot. During this recefs he alfo received ambaffadors with prefents and offers of fervice from Ambifures and Doxa reas, other two potent Indian monarchs. After this he reached the Hydafpes, about the fummer folftice, (the feason, when by the melting of the fnow on the hills, its waters are broadeft, deepest, and moft rapid;) where Porus lay encamped with a great army of tall, robust, hardy, and well difciplined troops, to hinder his paffage. Porus had made fuch judicious difpofitions, that Alexander had to exert his utmost military fkill, before he could get the better of his vigilance. At laft, however, partly by ftratagem, partly by his ufual good fortune, a ftorm of thunder, lightning, and hail, happening in the precife time to conceal his movements from the enemy, and ceafing juft in the critical moment, when his troops were ready to pass the river, he croffed the Hydafpes, with 5000 horfe and 6000 foot, before Porus had fufficient time to oppofe him. He fent his fon, however, with 2000 horfe and 120 armed chariots for that purpofe; but Alexander defeated them with great flaughter, killed Porus's fon, and took the armed chariots. Upon this difafter Porus, leaving part of his army and elephants to oppofe Craterus, marched out of his camp at the head of 30,000 foot, 4000 horfe, 300 chariots, and 200 elephants; and choofing a firm plain, where these last could act with advantage, waited the arrival of the Macedonians. Soon after they came up, when a fhort but very bloody battle enfued. Porus's cavaly fought bravely, but were foon routed; and though they rallied were again defeated, as well as his numerous body of foot; many of whom were trampled to death by the elephants, who, being wounded by the Macedonian archers, occafioned as much confufion among the Indian troops as among the Macedonians. Porus himself behaved with the greatest valour and intrepidity; but Craterus coming up with his troops, fell upon the flying Indians, and increafed the flaughter fo much, that 20,000 foot and 3000 horfe were killed, befides two of Porus's fons and moft of his officers; and all the elephants and chariots were either destroyed or taken. Alexander had given ftrict orders not to injure Porus, and fent Taxiles to perfuade him to furrender, which he refused, but was afterwards prevailed upon to do by his old friend Merce, an Indian in Alex ander's fervice. Alexander immediately gave Porus his liberty, and foon after reflored him to his kingdom, to which he annexed many valuable provinces; fo that, except in the lofs of his fons and his troops, he was a confiderable gainer upon the whole. Nor was Alexander a lofer by his generofity, for Porus remained his faithful ally ever after. In memory of this victory, Alexander caused two cities to be built: one on the field of battle, named NICEA; the other on the river, named BUCEPHALA, after his horfe who died here. The foldiers who fell in battle he buried with great honours; offered facrifices, and exhibited shows on the banks of the Hydafpes. He then entered the territories of the Glaufe, in which were 37 cities and many villages; all

which being delivered up without fighting, he added them to the dominions of Porus, as well as thofe of another Porus, whom he conquered, which lay on the banks of the Hydraotes, a branch of the Indus. Notwithstanding this fuccefs, the Catheri, Oxydraca, and Malli, 3 of the most warlike nations of India, confederated and raised a great army against Alexander; who immediately fet out, and in a few days reached SANGALA, a city on the top of a hill, with a lake behind it, where the confederates lay encamped, furrounded by 3 circular lines of carriages locked together. In these ftrong entrenchments Alexander attacked them, and though they made a gallant defence, he fucceffively forced their entrenchments, and took the city by ftorm two days after; when 17,000 Indians were killed and 70,000 taken prifoners, with soo horfe and 300 chariots; while the killed and wounded of the Macedonians were only 1300. The people of the adjacent cities immediately fled to the mountains, and though promifed kind treatment upon their fubmitting, refused to return. Where upon Alexander ordered Sangala to be rafed, and gave the territories to those who had fubmitted to him. He next prepared to pass the Hyphafis and reduce under his fubjection the rich and fer tile countries beyond its banks, which were inha bited by a civilized and martial people; but al his rhetoric and all his popularity could not pre vail upon his troops to proceed farther. H therefore refolved to make the Hyphafis th boundary of his dominions; and having erecte 12 large altars, he offered facrifices, and exhibited fhows with great magnificence: after which, arri ving at the Hydafpes, he failed down the Indu into the ocean: having for that purpofe equippe a fleet of 80 large fhips with 3 banks of oars, an 20co fmall veffels and tranfports, under the mo skilful Phoenician, Cyprian, Carian, and Egyp tian navigators. Craterus and Hephæftion had marched before with another divifion of the army and in 3 days the fleet arrived oppofite to the camps; where Alexander was informed, tha the Oxydrace and Malli were railing forces t oppofe him. Upon this he refolved to reduc them, but at the confluence of the Acefines an Hydafpes, ran no small risk of his life, by the ra pidity of the currents, eddies, and whirlpools, a their junction, which swallowed up many of hi long veffels with all the men on board. Afte escaping this danger, Alexander went on thor and having divided his army into different bodies under Craterus, Hephæftion, Ptolemy, and hin felf, he marched through the defert, and furpr fed the Malli, who did not suspect that he woul have ventured through that barren and dream region. After taking feveral of their cities an cafties, and flaughtering the inhabitants, many whom fled and abandoned their cities, whi others burned themselves rather than furrende he at laft marched to their capital; but findin the inhabitants had fled, he proceeded to th Hydraotes, where he found 50,000 men encam ed on the oppofite bank to prevent his pallag He entered the river, however, with a party horfe, which fo terrified the Indians, that the

who

« PreviousContinue »