Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

The French apicultural exhibit scattered-Apiculture at the Agri-

cultural Congress-Hives exhibited by the Société Centrale d'Api-
culture et d'Insectologie-The "Jeanne d'Arc" hive of Mme. la
Vicomtesse de Poli-Superiority of the United States exhibit-Aus-
tria: Observation hive of Mr. Michael Ambrožič. Belgium: De-
cadence of apiculture in that country. Great Britain: Langstroth
hives and Quinby bee-smokers, exhibited by Mr. T. B. Blow-
Greece-Luxemburg-Roumania-Switzerland—Japan.

OTHER USEFUL INSECTS...

Cochineal-Cantharides.

INSECTS INJURIOUS TO AGRICULTURE.

General character of the exhibit in this class-Related chiefly to the

Grape Phylloxera. Locusts in Algeria: Vigorous measures of defense
taken by the French Government-The Melhafa Cypriote machine for
catching locusts-The injurious species is Stauronotus maroccanus.

Page.

376

History of the Phylloxera. First description by Dr. Asa Fitch and

first notice of its work in Europe-Identity of the European and
American forms established-Spread and present distribution-Losses
caused in France. Life history: The four forms of the insect—
Balbiani's theory regarding the destruction of the winter egg-Out-
lines of the two-year life-cycle—The young of the gall form may be
easily colonized on the roots-Continuous reproduction of the root
form on the European vine-Means of dispersion. Methods of con-
trolling the Phylloxera: American resistant stocks-Planting in
sands-Bisulphide of carbon-Its mode of application-The Pal in-
jector invented by Gastine and perfected by Vermorel-Treatment
of the vines with Pal injectors-The Jamain method of inclosing the
bisulphide in gelatine capsules-The traction injector of Vernette-
Traitement d'extinction: The Fafeur apparatus for combining water
with bisulphide-Mode of using it-Sulpho-carbonate of potassium-
Results obtained therewith and methods of application-Destruction
of the winter egg-Balbiani's mixture-Submersion-The Phylloxera
effectually destroyed thereby-Submergible regions of limited ex-
tent-How submersion is practiced-Centrifugal steam pumps for
elevating water for submersion.

General nature of the exhibit-Short-horns-Herefords-Other

English races-The Belgium and Holland exhibit--The Angeln
race-The Switzerland exhibit: The Freiburg race-The dark-brown
Switz-French races of cattle: The Normandy or Cotentin breed-
Breton cattle-The Cherolaise and Nivernaise-Cherolaise breed-
Garonnaise cattle-The Flemish race-The Parthenaise cattle-
Algerian cattle: The Guelma or Cheurfa race.

Page

439

Character of the exhibit-Races-The Celtic race-The Iberian

race-The Asiatic race-The Normandy swine.

General nature of the exhibit-Lack of attention paid to poultry-

breeding in France-The Leghorn fowl-The Gascon fowl—Wyan-
dotte and other breeds-Turkeys-Geese-Ducks-The pigeon show-
Guinea-fowl exhibit-The rabbit show.

General character of the exhibit-Pure-blooded horses-Arab

thoroughbreds-English thoroughbreds-Anglo-Arabs-The Barb or
Barbary horse-French cross-bred horses or Demi-sang-Draft
horses-Exhibit of donkeys and mules.

LETTER OF SUBMITTAL.

WASHINGTON, D. C., June 30, 1890. SIR: I have the honor to submit herewith my report on Agriculture (Group VIII), at the late International Exposition, held in Paris, France, in accordance with the commission from President Cleveland of September 27, 1888, and the general instructions from T. F. Bayard, Secretary of State, of January 10, 1889.

I take this occasion to thank you for the many courtesies you have extended and for the sympathy you have shown in the work which has thereby been made pleasant, and which, I trust, may prove profitable to our people.

Respectfully, yours,

Gen. Wм. B. FRANKLIN,

Commissioner-General, etc., Hartford, Conn.

C. V. RILEY.

21

INTRODUCTORY.

The Paris Exposition of 1889 differed from that of 1878 in at least one important particular, namely, in the great attention given to agriculture.

In his report upon agricultural products in 1878 Commissioner Woodman says:

At the Centennial exhibition agriculture was placed on an equality, in every respect, with other interests, and a substantial building was erected, with ample accommodations, in which were placed side by side the agricultural exhibits of every nationality represented. At the Paris Exposition no agricultural building was provided, nor was sufficient space assigned in the main buildings for foreign agricultural exhibits. Hence each of the principal nations competing was obliged to erect buildings of its own for this purpose, which were necessarily detached and unfavorably located for an international agricultural exhibition.

It is to be regretted that the agricultural products of the United States were not more fully represented. This is to be attributed to a want of means and time to collect and prepare samples of products for exhibition. It seems that the interest of agriculture as well as the financial and commercial interests of the country would have been promoted by placing on exhibition fair and well-arranged samples of all the products of our soil for which we are seeking markets abroad.

A great contrast to this state of things was shown in 1889; for not only was ample space, with convenient buildings, especially adapted for the purpose, provided for all the agricultural exhibits, but the agriculture of the United States was fully represented in a collective exhibit prepared under the direction of the Secretary of Agriculture, and which was, after that of France, admitted to be the largest and most complete of any shown at the Exposition.

By reference to the plan of the Exposition grounds it will be seen that the agricultural galleries occupied the entire length of the Quai d'Orsay from the Champ de Mars to the Esplanade des Tuilleries. There was a double row of these galleries, consisting of substantial iron-framed sheds, one story in height, and of a nearly uniform width of about 40 feet, but of varying length. The total length of these galleries was about 7,000 feet, the space covered was 9.06 acres, and uncovered 6.65 acres; i. e., 14.71 acres were devoted to the exhibits.

Six of these galleries were allotted to France, while the two smallest were given to Great Britain, and the remaining two, including the longest, were divided among other countries, viz, the

« PreviousContinue »