Page images
PDF
EPUB

system of worldly policy. And even under this view, we may be justly surprised that men of enlarged and powerful intellects, should be satisfied with arguments so intrinsically weak. This may, however, be considered as evidence that stronger ones are not to be found.

After all that has been said upon the subject, the question, how far the principles of inviolable peace, if carried into practice, would promote or endanger the prosperity of nations, has actually but little connection with the inquiry, which, as believers in the doctrines of christianity, we are bound to entertain. The real question is, What do the precepts and doctrines of our Saviour and his Apostles enjoin? We need not enquire whether offensive and defensive wars are equally criminal-and we do not assert that they arebut whether either can be justified upon Christian principles. If the maxims of our Lord, and the spirit of his religion, are irreconcilable with the prosecutions of wars, either offensive or defensive, we are required, as consistent Christians, to abstain from both, and leave the consequences to divine disposal.

We can read but little of the New Testament without perceiving that our Saviour forewarned his disciples, that obedience to his mandates would often subject them to persecution. He even admonished them to rejoice and be exceeding glad, when men should revile and persecute them, for his sake; assuring them that great was their reward in heaven; and reminding them that in like manner had the prophets been persecuted. In this, a doctrine widely different from that of political expediency was inculcated. He taught his disciples that their obedience was not to be measured by the frowns or favours of man; and that the religion which he offered to their acceptance, was well worth suffering for. His own example, as well as his precepts, inculcated the propriety of avoiding needless exposure. When the crowds were pressing upon him, he directed a ship to be prepared, in which he sat and taught the people, who stood on the shore. And on several occasions he escaped from the irritated multitudes; but he made no compromise of principle, either in his doctrines or his life.

The professors of Christianity, who advocate defensive war, never meet the question fairly. They all, like the writer under review, endeavour to show the injuries which we must sustain, by the adoption of a pacific course. They do not attempt to prove that the spirit of war, and the spirit of christianity are reconcilable. If we enquire whether the injunctions of our Lord are of universal obligation, or whether they are to be dispensed with, whenever we may apprehend that obedience would subject us to difficulty or danger, the answer, from every professor of the Christian name, would, no doubt, be in favour of absolute obedience. The supposition that the divine requisitions are to be observed or neglected, according to our own conceptions of safety or danger,

amounts to nothing less than constituting ourselves, not the Author of christianity, the arbiters of our duties.

It may not be impertinent to enquire, whether the doctrines of the gospel could ever have obtained a place in the world, if the Apostles and immediate followers of our Lord had acted upon the timid policy adopted by the advocates of war. The world, with the exception of Palestine, was overspread with idolatry; and in Judea the opposition to the new religion was quite as intense as among the pagan nations. If they reasoned upon the consequences, their conclusions must have been coincident with the declaration of their Master, that they would be hated and persecuted by all nations for his sake. But the magnanimous conclusion, that they ought to obey God rather than man, silenced their reasoning. Here we have, in a few words, a conclusive answer to all the arguments deducible from the real or imaginary consequences of obedience to divine requisition. Upon no other principle of action, could the doctrines of the gospel have been promulgated eighteen hundred years ago; and on no other can they be effectually maintained in this or any future age. An attempt to elude and explain away the force of the gospel precepts, by considerations of expediency, is an attempt to degrade the doctrines of christianity into a system of worldly policy.

Now we cannot fail to perceive, that the London Editor has not undertaken to prove the compatibility of war, either offensive or defensive, with the tenor and spirit of christianity; he has even admitted that Friends "derive their beautiful and angelic maxim," on this subject, "from the gospel." Of course, upon this admission, it must be a gospel maxim. But he insists, that "until the larger half of Europe have religion and wisdom enough to practice it, and physical force sufficient to deter the wicked from making aggressions upon it," the system of military force must still be relied on for the maintenance of peace.

The purport of this argument seems to be, that the pacific maxims of Friends are, no doubt, consistent with the gospel plan; but they cannot be safely acted upon yet. We are not yet in the millenium. We must keep up our military establishments, and stand prepared to repel force by force, "until at least the larger half of Europe will agree to act upon the principles of the gospel. I should think that, upon this writer's theory, we must wait till every nation in Europe, if not in the world, shall adopt the pacific system. This is nearly equivalent to a declaration that the Christian religion would be a beautiful and angelic system, if universally embraced; but as long as any nation refuses to adopt its practical maxims, all others must adhere to a plan totally irreconcilable with its principles. The writer would appear to think that Christianity was introduced into the world too soon; that even

yet, eighteen hundred years after it was offered to the acceptance of man, the world is not prepared for its reception. The world has not yet religion and wisdom enough to practice it. It may be well to inquire, whether anything but the gospel itself will ever make the world wise and religious enough to act upon its precepts.

"King Agrippa, believest thou the prophets?" I hope we can generally answer in the affirmative, and consequently must admit that the time will come when wars and warlike preparations shall cease; when the arts of war will not be learned. The means by which this change is to be effected, are unquestionably furnished by the religion generally professed in Europe and America. If this religion is entirely and essentially pacific and that it is, is attested by the whole tenor of the New Testament, as well as by the appellation assigned to its Author and Head-the Prince of Peace then whenever and wherever this religion has produced its full effect, war must cease. "My kingdom is not of this world, else would my servants fight," plainly implies that the kingdom of Christ cannot be established by force of arms. A declaration or an intimation that the world is not yet prepared for adopting a pacific course, implies that the people are not prepared to receive and embrace the doctrines of the gospel.

If we admit, as the London editor evidently does, that the pacific maxims of Friends are deduced from the gospel, the question of war or peace is reduced to a single point; are we to obey the precepts of the gospel, and rely for protection upon divine power, or will we entrust our safety to the strength and policy of regardless of the doctrines which we profess to

revere?

man,

The question will probably be asked, Must not civil government be sustained; and can that be done without the aid of military force?

The full investigation of this subject would require more room than can now be spared. But the true believer in the divine authority of the Christian religion will readily agree that this question can bring us back no further than to the inquiry, whether military force can be employed in consistency with the principles of Christianity. To assume the position that human government must be maintained at the expense of Christianity, and in violation of its maxims, is to declare human government superior to the obligations of the gospel. The most that can be safely asserted is, that civil government ought to be supported, as far as it can be done, in conformity with the spirit and maxims of the gospel.

It may, however, be observed, that as the government, whatever its form, is essentially the power of the people, in whatever degree the principles of Christianity become predominant in a nation, in the same degree will the occasion for physical force in the preservation of order be removed. When the people at large have but

little of the leaven of Christianity, the legislation, as well as the execution of the laws, will be chiefly founded on principles of an opposite character; and, of course, obedience to those laws will be unavoidably enforced by means accordant with their nature and origin. Cruel and oppressive laws of course can hardly be supported by means entirely pacific. But where the spirit of the gospel acquires the ascendancy, the legislation partakes of its influence, oppressive laws are repealed, or suffered to fall into desuetude; and those only are retained which are mild and equitable. Hence government is known for the good it diffuses, and, receiving the support of public opinion, requires little if anything more to sustain it. E. L.

For Friends' Review.

PROFITS OF A DAIRY FARM.

Illustration by example is one of the most powerful modes of teaching. It is universally conceded that the farmer labours hard, and that his gains are slow. Not a few, in our cities at least, are apt to believe that he is also tardy to adopt the daily improvements in his art, and too often clings tenaciously to the practices of his

fathers.

We are not about to discuss these matters, much less to find fault with the plain matter of fact agriculturist, because he does not lay hold, with the hurry of a steam engine, of every visionary project proposed to him by the crack-brained philosopher who lives upon theory. He eats his bread in the sweat of his face, and he is shrewd enough to know that it is best to

be well convinced that this sweat will not be

wasted, before he expends it in the trial of headlong experiments.

In the Transactions of the New York State Agricultural Society, for the last year, is an account of the dairy operations of John Holbert, of Chemung county, south of Seneca Lake, and not far from the Pennsylvania line. It is to me very interesting, and I donbt not will be equally so, and not a little instructive to many of the readers of the Review. As some old writerperhaps Tusser-remarked,

"A little farm well tilled, A little barn well filled, A little wife well willed," are among the really valuable adjuncts to a comfortable living: and while we may rest well satisfied in the matter of the farm and the barn, I am willing to hope that our friend Holbert was no less fixed to his mind in his helpmeet. The statement cannot fail to arouse and waken up the sleepy farmer, and place before him in a strong light the vast advantages of a good, thorough management of land. A PLOUGHMAN.

The farm contains 200 acres of land, which was farmed the past season as follows:-I have

[ocr errors]

kept and milked 40 cows, and my grain pastures and meadows are as follows:-24 acres of wheat; 8 of buckwheat; 10 of oats; 20 of corn and potatoes; 2 of summer fallow; 40 of meadow; 74 of pastures; 22 of wood and waste land. The soil is a gravelly loam, with a slight mixture of black sand; subsoil the same. I use no roots nor slops for my cows; all that I feed them is hay and grass, and corn stalks. My pastures are clover and timothy, and hay the same; and my meadows produce from one to two and a half tons per acre per annum. I sow plaster on all my pastures and meadows every year, and use the Cayuga plaster.

Breed of Cows. My cows are generally the common breed. I have a few that have a slight mixture of Durham blood in them. Their ages will range from three years old to twelve. I prefer a cow not less than five years old for the dairy, and as much older as she winters well. I change pastures often, and think it a good plan to change twice a week. Too much care cannot be taken to have your cows well watered and salted. I keep a large watering trough in my cow yard, where I very frequently observe cows drinking large quantities of water immediately after coming from the brook. I keep salt lying in the yard the year round.

Making Butter.-I take care to have my cellar thoroughly cleansed and whitewashed early every spring. I keep milk in one cellar and butter in another. Too much care cannot be taken by dairymen to observe the time of churning. I usually churn from one hour to one hour and a half. I put from one to two pails of cold water in each churn, before commencing to churn, and one pail more in each, when nearly done, in order to thin the milk, and make it produce all the butter it contains. When done, take the butter out, wash it through one water, then set it in the cellar and salt it; then work it from three to five times before packing. Butter should not be made quite salt enough until the last working. Then add a little salt, which makes a brine that keeps the butter sweet. One ounce of salt to a pound of butter is about the quantity I use. I pack the first day, if the weather is cool; if warm, the second day. If the milk is too warm when churned, the quantity of butter will be less, and the quality and flavour not so good as when it is cool at a proper temperature. I have always worked my butter by hand. Last fall, I bought a butter worker, but I disapprove of its use entirely, and recommend the hand ladle in its stead. In packing, I fill my firkins within two inches of the top; then lay a clean cloth on the top of the butter, and put salt on the cloth and keep it covered with salt and brine all the season. Great care should be taken not to let the milk stand too long before churning; as, in that case, in hot weather, it becomes too sour, and the butter will be sour also, and in cool weather it becomes bitter; all

of which can be prevented in cool weather, by putting about one quart of buttermilk in each pan or tub before straining the milk, and in hot weather, by churning as soon as the milk becomes thick and moist on the top of the cream. I use the Turk's Island salt of the Ashton sacks. I have never used any of the solar evaporated salt, nor steam refined salt from the Onondaga salt works.

Experiments. I tried several experiments in making butter the past season, among which are the following:-Commenced making butter about the first of April, and up to the 4th of May, made 512 pounds of butter. May 5th, 1848, commenced packing for fall market, and closed about the 15th of December. June 15th, drew the milk from thirty-seven cows; morning's mess, 525 pounds; evening's mess, 632 pounds of milk; in all, 1,157 pounds of milk, making three pounds eleven and a half ounces of butter, to 100 pounds of milk. June 20th, had three more cows come in, which made my dairy full. My cows commence coming in, or calving, in March, and do not all come in until the middle of June, as was the case this year. My dairy was not full until the 20th of June. I do not rear all the calves, but generally save a few of the finest. This year I reared six. I keep swine to consume the buttermilk.

I drew the milk from five cows for 30 days in succession, commencing with the 28th day of May, with the following result:-I made 248 pounds of butter from five cows in 30 days. On the 11th day of June, I drew from five cows 187 pounds of milk, which made, when churned, eight and a half pounds of butter. I churn all the milk, and churn by horse power, and usually churn four one-and-a-half barrel churns at once.

On the 8th day of August last, I drew the milk from forty cows; in the morning, I got 508 pounds, and in the evening, 519 pounds; in all, 1,027 pounds of milk, which, when churned, made 39 pounds of butter. The morning's mess made three pounds and fourteen ounces of butter, from 100 pounds of milk, and the evening's mess made three pounds and ten ounces of butter from 100 pounds of milk. I find that the morning's mess of milk made four ounces more butter than the evening's did from 100 pounds of milk. I also find that the difference between the morning's and evening's milk is not so great as it was for the last year, for the reason that the messes are more nearly equal.

I find by churning the milk separate, that one of my best cows will make as much butter, as three of my poorest giving the same quantity of milk. June is a much better month for making butter than July or August, as I made one hundred and seven pounds more butter from thirty-seven cows in June, than I did from forty in July. I find, also, that one hundred pounds of milk drawn from my best cows, (that is, those

that give the richest milk,) will make one pound, habitants of the United States each consume this
more butter than one hundred pounds drawn quantity, and the tea costs fifty cents per pound,
from the whole herd. There is more difference then fifteen millions of dollars are annually ex-
in quality than in quantity. For making butter, pended for the purchase of tea-in ten years
it will pay all dairymen well to look to the amounting to one hundred and fifty millions, or
quality of milk their cows give. One cow well more than four times the whole capital of the old
kept, is worth two cows poorly kept, for dairying. United States Bank.
I am inclined to think that too many farmers
overstock their farms, and consequently keep
their pastures too short; as lands that are kept
with a good coat of grass on them through the
season stand a drought much better and produce
pasture earlier the next season, and cows will do
better on them, than on shorter feed.

Quantity of Butter made.-As I have said before, I commenced making butter about the 1st of April, and up to May 4th, made 512 pounds; then commenced packing for the fall market. Made in May, 26 days, 747 pounds; in June, 30 days, made 1,186 pounds; in July, 31 days, 1,079 pounds; in August, 31 days, 1,016 pounds; and from September 1st, up to December 15th, three and a half months, 1,948 pounds, which is about the close of the season for making butter. I sold my dairy this year to R. Clearwater, at 183 Washington street, New York, on the 30th day of November, for 23 cents per pound, which amount was 5,030 pounds; the spring butter, and butter that was sent to the different fairs, and the butter that was made after the dairy was taken off, amounted to 1,450 pounds, the whole averaging 23 cents per pound, amounting in cash to $1,492.24; that is, over and above family use-and our family will average over eight in number—and which finally makes an average of $37.30 per cow, including heifers.

I sold my dairy last year to C. Adams & Co., at 224 Fulton street, New York, for 24 cents per pound. I am told by them that it went south and stood the climate well.

JOHN HOLBERT.

Chemung, Dec. 25th, 1848.

For Friends' Review.

TEA AND COFFEE.

The remarks of the editor and a correspondent, some weeks since, on the use of tobacco, and the enormous amount of money sunk by its consumption, to say nothing of its other bad effects, have induced the inquiry whether the same objection does not exist relative to the use of tea and coffee. I have no means at hand to ascertain the annual imports, and must therefore confine myself to a rough estimate, which perhaps some one may correct if it exceeds or falls below the actual amount.

It is not unusual for single families to pay from twenty five to fifty dollars annually for tea alone. Every person, in its habitual and daily use, probably uses on an average four pounds a year. If one half of the fifteen million free in

Here the inquiry very naturally springs up, is not tea useful or necessary as an article of diet? Tea contains no nutriment or the quantity_is so small that it is never taken into account. Its stimulating qualities alone recommend it to daily use. Now, is any advantage derived from the habitual use of stimulants for persons in health? Physiologists must say, no; for although it may impart temporary strength and hilarity at one period, this strength is drawn from the common fund, and a corresponding loss at another period is inevitable-if not at another time of day, or at another time of year, then in the decline of life. Nutriment imparts real, stimulants fictitious strength. The former is the energy given to the horse by feeding with oats; the latter, the vigor imparted by a stroke of the lash, producing temporary activity, but supplying no real strength.

But facts are better than argument, and I shall state only a few. The father of the writer, when more than fifty years of age, was afflicted with frequent and intense headaches. These were relieved by strong doses of tea and coffee. The debility produced by daily stimulants, and the disease from debility, called loudly for a repetition of the stimulant, to effect a temporary cure. But he was induced to discontinue wholly the use of these drinks, which he did gradually, by increasing the quantity of milk in admixture, until his beverage thus became warm milk. In a few weeks the severe attacks of " sick headache" entirely passed away, or became extremely rare; his general health improved, and even his sight grew so much better that he was compelled to purchase spectacles of greater focal length than those previously used. The use of milk had before invariably produced headache; now it became his daily beverage.

An intimate acquaintance, who had also been subject to frequent attacks of "sick headache," abstained wholly and suddenly. The withdrawal of the accustomed stimulant was followed by intense headache, which lasted some days; but not being of feeble resolution, he persevered. The result was improved health and entire freedom from headache for years afterwards.

Another person, thirty years of age, possessing less energy of purpose, commenced a discontinuance. A severe pain over his eyes soon reminded him that he had removed a regular source of temporary vigor; a strong decoction of tea consequently effected a temporary cure; and inclination and false reasoning combined, satisfied him that as it had removed his headache its daily use was a positive benefit.

More than a dozen instances have occurred

[ocr errors]

within the acquaintance of the writer, where habitual tea-drinkers have renounced its use. Nearly all were decidedly benefited, and none were made in the slightest degree worse, permanently, in health. One, advanced in years, remarked that no effect was more striking than the lessened irritability of the mind.

I have never known an instance of a person who was subject to regular attacks of that peculiarly distressing malady known as the sick headache, who was not in the habitual use of tea or coffee. One instance was however mentioned to me some years ago, of a young woman in very feeble health, not a "tea-drinker," who was severely afflicted in this way. "But does she never drink any coffee nor tea?" "Only once a day, and that is quite weak." But weak as it was it did its office, until a total discontinuance was followed by a perfect cure.

It can be hardly questioned, that, taking the community at large, the use of these drinks is a positive injury. There may be instances where young and vigorous constitutions are not sensibly affected, or where, from some peculiarity, little injury may be apparently produced for many years. There may also be instances when it may not be expedient for aged people, long in the habit, to relinquish its use. But it is greatly to be regretted that young persons should acquire a habit which is always expensive, and nearly always, sooner or later, visibly prejudicial to health; undoubtedly, in the majority of instances, materially shortening life. And with this view, is it not worthy of the consideration of those more advanced in years, whether the limited influence their example may afford, is not worth a strong effort to free themselves from the habit, independently of any consideration as to their own benefit?

Throwing entirely out of view the hundreds of millions of dollars which tea and coffee have cost the people at large, what is the amount annually expended by that comparatively minute portion, the Society of Friends? If the twenty thousand Friends' families in America pay only ten dollars each, which is doubtless a low estimate, the amount is two hundred thousand dollars a yearsufficient, in four years, to endow in the most liberal manner an excellent boarding school in every Yearly Meeting, and amounting, every ten years, to the sum of one million dollars.

For Friends' Review.

J.

ORNITHOGALUM EMBELLATUM-COMMON STAR

OF BETHLEHEM.

We read in the Book of Kings, that during a siege of Samaria, in the time of the prophet Elisha, the famine was so severe, that the fourth part of a cab, or about a pint, of dove's dung was sold for five pieces of silver. To most readers this is probably unintelligible, as the article reerred to does not appear suited for food, even in

a time of famine. The following extract from Callcott's Scripture Herbal, in which the article in question is mentioned, under the name at the head of this notice, may perhaps be interesting to some of our readers. The passage is borrowed from the London Friend.

The bulbous root of the ornithogalum has at all times been used as an esculent vegetable, in Syria and the neighbouring countries. Dioscorides says that it was sometimes dried, pulverised, and mixed with bread flour; and that it was also eaten both raw and roasted. He remarks further, that of thirty-six known species, one bearing a yellow flower yielded the most agreeable food. Laurentius, in his Essay on bulbous and tuberous Roots, says that in his time, the peasants of Italy and the neighbouring countries, often roasted the roots of the ornithogalum, and ate them like chestnuts; or lightly boiled them, and peeled and used them as salad, with oil, vinegar and pepper. The plains and valleys about Samaria abound in this pretty flower; and the dearth of its roots, during the siege of the city by the Syrians under Benhadad, was a token of famine beyond endurance. Jehoram, the son of Ahab, was king of Israel when his capital was surrounded by the Syrian host. He was passing along upon the town wall, when a woman shrieked to him for help: "And he said, if the Lord help thee not, whence shall I help thee? what aileth thee?" Then follows that tale of horror: the mothers had devoured their offspring for the famine! "And it came to pass, when the king had heard the words of the woman, that he rent his clothes; and he passed by upon the wall, and the people looked, and, behold, he had sackcloth within upon his flesh."

The ornithogalum grows wild in many countries. There are several pretty varieties in Spain and Portugal, but scarcely more agreeable to the sight than our own English Star of Bethlehem.

VIRGINIA.

In a speech recently made in the Virginia Legislature, in favour of a bill to incorporate the Virginia Coal Company, Mr. Faulkner, of Berkley, stated that the coal fields of that State covered 21,400 square miles out of the total area of 64,000-an extent equal to that of England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales combined! Cannel, or purely bituminous coal, abounds throughout the basin of the Kanhawha, and was so accessible that a single hand would dig with ease two hundred bushels per day.

There is not a State in the Union, enjoying so many advantages of position, climate, soil, mineral resources, water power, everything, in short, that may be reckoned necessary to the building up of a great prosperous Commonwealth, as Virginia; yet every census puts her lower and lower in the scale as compared with her sister States. Her once fertile fields are running to waste; and

« PreviousContinue »