Infinite Distance between Self-motion and Motion by Impulse. -Impassable Chasm between Spirit and Matter.-Ideas of Argument of Ancient Atheists that Apparent Evidences of Design were only Evidences of subsequent Accommodation. The Motions of the Evil Soul Irregular and Disorderly. — The nearer an Approach to the Pure Reason, the more of Fixed- ness and Uniformity.-Heaven a State of Eternal Rest.- Atheistic Objection from the unvarying Regularity of the Platonic Doctrine of the Animation of the Heavenly Bodies. Sublime Mode in which the Bible represents the Divine Provi- dence and Omniscience as contrasted with all mere Philos- ophizing on these Attributes.-Analysis of the Greek Word Men Compared to Sheep of the Divine Pasture.-Language of Plato on this Subject in Harmony with that of the Scriptures 261 Great Things cannot Exist without Small.-Application of the The Ancient Maxim De Nihilo Nihil.-Greek Ideas in Respect to Creation. Language of the Fathers. - Plato defended against the Charge of teaching the Eternity of the World and of Matter.-Platonic Sense of the Maxim.-Comparison of Hebrews, xi., 3, with the Language of Plato.-Difficulties Doctrine that the Parts are made for the Whole as set forth by Plato, and as viewed by Modern Rationalists and Semi- Infidels. The Converse Doctrine, that the Whole is also for Explanation of a Difficult Passage.-Remarks on those Views that resolve Morality into an Obedience to Physical Laws, and regard all Punishment as Consequential instead of Penal 294 The Word "Ayios.- Exceeding Spirituality of some of Plato's Views. Many of his Thoughts capable of being fairly ac- commodated to a Spiritual Sense higher than the Author him- self had ever intended to convey.-Difference in this Re- Explanation of a Difficult Passage, in which Plato seems to assert that our Evils in the Present State exceed our Good 339 Máxn 'Alávaros, or Battle of the Universe, between the Pow- ers of Good and Evil. -Sin, therefore, no Light Matter, be- Beauty and Accuracy of the Ancient and Platonic Division of the Four Cardinal Virtues.-Deep Moral Significance of the Different Species of Atheists.-Morality of Atheists not found- ed on Principle.-First Species styled Aíkaιos by Plato, and invested by him with too Good a Character.-Second Species, the Magician or Juggler. — The Atheist often in Secret the Victim of Superstition.-Hobbes.-The Ironical Species of STATEMENT OF THE ARGUMENT. As a dramatic work, The Laws is far inferior to the Republic. The speakers are three: namely, Clinias, a Cretan, Megillus, a Lacedæmonian, and a stranger, who passes by no other name than the Athenian. The latter is the Socrates of the dialogue. The first two are either mere listeners, or only brought in as suggestive helps in the various transitions of the discourse. After nine books occupied with varied and extended schemes of legislation, and where laws are mingled with reasonings and introductory preambles, which need not here be specified, the author comes, in the tenth book, to treat of offences against the public worship and religion, which it is supposed, of course, the State must possess, if it would be a state indeed, and not a mere herding together of men and women in a political congregation, having no other bond of union than the temporary consent of individual wills. Previously, however, to the enactment of laws for the punishment of sacrilege and other offences against religion, the chief speaker proposes that there should be laid down, by way of foundation, a preamble or hortatory statement, containing the reasons of the laws; which preamble, although concisely expressed at first (page 3), is subsequently expanded into an argument which occupies nearly the whole book, the few last pages only being taken up with the laws and the penalties annexed. The argument is divided into three parts; Against those who denied the Divine existence; 2. Against those who, while they admitted the existence of a God, denied a providence; and, 3. Against those who, while they admitted both a God and a providence, maintained that the Deity was easily propitiated, or would not punish sin severely. The first part is introduced by a declaration of Clinias, that it must be easy to prove the existence of the Deity. He appeals at once to the most obvious phenomena of nature, the sun, the earth, and stars, &c., as conclusive evidence, especially if taken in connexion with the universal sentiments of mankind. This gives occasion to the chief speaker to suggest that the subject is involved in greater difficulties than the other, in his simplicity, had imagined; difficulties, however, not intrinsic, but arising from the perverseness of those who imposed upon themselves by the words chance, nature, art, &c., referring to the old Atheists of the Ionic or Materializing school (page 4 to page 15). After a short digression, in which it is |