Κ' οὐδὲν ἔλεξε (ΠΟΘΕΝ;) βοϊ γὰρ λόγον οὐ πόρε φύτλη « Sed in his omnibus locis πόθεν mihi videtur esse non οὐδαμῶς, sed, Unde hoc? Quidni? Cur ita hoc evenit?" S. Seyer. Resp. Si Latine reddere voluissem, in promtu erat, Qui potuere? sed nibil melius HESYCHII interpretatione, Пóbev; ΟΥΔΑΜΩΣ μεθ ̓ ὑποκρίσεως. PROLOGUE TO THE ANDRIA OF TERENCE; PERFORMED AT WESTMINSTER SCHOOL, DEC. 1825. DUNLOP. Salvete! nobis benevoli et Terentio! Atqui (fatemur) nonnihil veriti sumus, Nam crescit isthæc indies opinio, Musæ videtis quam gravi in periculo At nosmet istud erimus auctores mali? Hoc, usa Græcis semper exemplaribus, Consueta nobis præstat Institutio : EPILOGUE. CRITO, solus. Demiror nusquamne mihi caupona? columnæ Ne plus ultra olim peregrino— (Prodit DAVUS.) Oh! Dave! quid istuc D. Urbana reperta Ornati est ? D. Dî me denique respiciunt. Res ubi civiles agitant. D. Propria, obsecro, soli Nonne alios, vivunt quotcunque, domique suique Excipit hos grandis, vastæque innixa culinæ, Est quoque Curator scitissimus-hoc ego fungor P. A mensa atque toro possim divortia ferre ; A mensâ et chartâ stat mihi nulla pati. C. Dî magni atque Deæ! at, nuptis tam barbara passis, D. Actum aiunt secum; et pejori lege queruntur C. Inventum inventorum hoc est; hoc jam omnia vincit. Hanc qui non requiem poscat sibi. Commoda nescis, Quin referam―ante focum lecti mollissima pluma, At notos-nutu-nictu-risuve saluto: Reddere personæ congrua cuique meum est. Lux hæc inter abit :-quinta dein scribitur hora "Nulla dies nobis sine litera." C. At, oro, paratus Rarius hoc conclave patens plerumque subimus; Ebiberit. C. Parce permodiceque tuus. Vel Regem efficiunt-nulla et mercede ministri Donandi. C. Laudo hoc-optima conditio est. Quin me duc; nam tecum hodie cœnare-D. Quid, audax, Inceptas? umbris accubuisse nefas. P. Quod licet, inspexisse dabo, et per singula ducam ; [Exeunt PAM. et Dav. ORIGINES; Or, Remarks on the Origin of several States, Empires, and Cities. BY SIR W. DRUMMOND. 8vo. AFTER a careful perusal of this learned and elaborate work on Chronology and History, the following remarks occurred to me as perhaps calculated to be useful in the investigations which form the subject of Sir W. Drummond's researches. Ancient Chronology is a subject from which the learned turn away with dread, and the unlearned, either with contempt, or with full satisfaction in whatever one book they have selected as their oracle. The number of those who, by having made themselves acquainted with the existing differences of opinion on this subject, and the hinges on which the controversies turn, are competent to form a judgment on Ancient Chronology, is exceedingly small. It has not fallen to my lot to meet with even one person acquainted with the principia of the subject; neither do I profess myself to have done more than reduce to short tables, and so bring before the eye, the systems of Usher, Newton, Jackson, Hales and Faber. In the present age, the old maxim, Omne ignotum pro magnifico, no longer holds good; but, on the contrary, the levelling principle proclaims, to the great satisfaction of the oi Toddol, Omne ignotum pro inutili; and therefore, now if ever, the la borious chronologist may expect that his labors will be misapprehended by ignorance and aspersed by envy and self-suffici ency. age There is also another discouragement, which I am not aware has been clearly stated. The judgment of sensible men is like a pair of scales: it weighs the pros and cons and decides by their preponderation. Horace possessed this judgment when he pronounced, Non ego paucis offendar maculis; and Sir Isaac Newton, after having perused the commentators on the Prophecies, observed, "Amongst the interpreters of the last there is scarce one of note, who hath not made some discovery worth knowing; and thence I seem to gather that God is about opening these mysteries," (Observations on the Prophecies, p. 253.) And Mr. Waple exhibited this accurate and impartial judgment, when he observed, that "the many errors and divisions which sprung up with the reformation, plainly prove, that there were many tares mixed with it; but which God hath been pleased to make use of to many good ends; there being scarce any erroneous persuasion in religion, which hath not some truth mixed with it; and which was not occasioned by some neglect in the church, which God, by those extremes punishes them for, and calls on them to reform," (Waple on Revel. x. 6, 7.) But perhaps the finest example of impartial and sound judgment is that displayed by Bishop Burnet in his exposition of the 17th Article of the Church. Sound judgment finds pearls in rubbish; unsound judgment finds rubbish in pearls; sound judgment discriminates and sums up; unsound judgment confounds and decides by ex-parte evidence. The views which are sometimes taken of such great works as this of Sir W. Drummond, frequently remind me of the fable of Momus and Venus. But let this great investigator proceed: I observe much in his work of very great importance; and I offer the following remarks with diffidence, though not without hope that they may be useful. The first thought then that struck me, was that a system of ancient chronology may be compared to the old woman's fagot, which she endeavored to break without advice and without assistance. It then occurred to me that if a stick could be taken out of the said fagot and your learned correspondents would favor the public with their joint exertions, this stick might be broken, and perhaps, in the end, the whole fagot surmounted. Permit me then to select such a question as, if decided, may be of great importance not only in itself, but ultimately in relation to other questions. This question is one which I have |